BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18556920)

  • 1. Distinguishing between the precision of attentional localization and attentional resolution.
    Moore CM; Lanagan-Leitzel LK; Fine EM
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 May; 70(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 18556920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating temporal properties of covert shifts of visual attention using the attentional walk task.
    Hein E; Moore CM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 20081159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explicit eye movements failed to facilitate the precision of subsequent attentional localization.
    Hein E; Moore CM
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 197(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 19593553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations.
    Kerzel D; Born S; Schönhammer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1362-70. PubMed ID: 22428670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104732. PubMed ID: 33862440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution.
    Yeshurun Y
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1375-87. PubMed ID: 15066397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.
    Abrams RA; Dobkin RS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Jun; 20(3):467-77. PubMed ID: 8027710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?
    Shih SI; Sperling G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):758-79. PubMed ID: 8666962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 1431742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonspatial attributes of stimuli can influence spatial limitations of attentional control.
    Moore CM; Lanagan-Leitzel LK; Chen P; Halterman R; Fine EM
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Apr; 69(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 17672424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects.
    Shim WM; Alvarez GA; Jiang YV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 18488657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation.
    Kerzel D
    Cognition; 2019 May; 186():20-31. PubMed ID: 30739056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature-based attention is functionally distinct from relation-based attention: The double dissociation between color-based capture and color-relation-based capture of attention.
    Du F; Jiao J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):480-93. PubMed ID: 26523490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can one pay attention to a particular color?
    Brawn P; Snowden RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jul; 61(5):860-73. PubMed ID: 10499000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 20121291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1930-1941. PubMed ID: 30285577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal sequence of attentional modulation in the lateral intraparietal area and middle temporal area during rapid covert shifts of attention.
    Herrington TM; Assad JA
    J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 30(9):3287-96. PubMed ID: 20203188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.