143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18557693)
1. Detection of aberrant responding on a personality scale in a military sample: an application of evaluating person fit with two-level logistic regression.
Woods CM; Oltmanns TF; Turkheimer E
Psychol Assess; 2008 Jun; 20(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 18557693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between hypochondriacal concerns and personality dimensions and traits in a military population.
Noyes R; Watson DB; Letuchy EM; Longley SL; Black DW; Carney CP; Doebbeling BN
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2005 Feb; 193(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 15684913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Personality traits and pathology in older and younger incarcerated women.
Hurt S; Oltmanns TF
J Clin Psychol; 2002 Apr; 58(4):457-64. PubMed ID: 11920697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality for Youth (SNAP-Y): a new measure for assessing adolescent personality and personality pathology.
Linde JA; Stringer D; Simms LJ; Clark LA
Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):387-404. PubMed ID: 23794180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temperament and character dimensions assessed in general population, in individuals with psychoactive substance dependence and in young male conscripts.
Vitoratou S; Ntzoufras I; Theleritis C; Smyrnis N; Stefanis NC
Eur Psychiatry; 2015 Jun; 30(4):474-9. PubMed ID: 25687735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing Two Alternative Pathological Personality Measures in the Assessment of Psychopathy: An Examination of the Snap and DAPP-BQ.
Pryor LR; Miller JD; Gaughan ET
J Pers Disord; 2009 Feb; 23(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 19267664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The representation of four personality disorders by the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality dimensional model of personality.
Morey LC; Warner MB; Shea MT; Gunderson JG; Sanislow CA; Grilo C; Skodol AE; McGlashan TH
Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 14593832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A noncognitive temperament test to predict risk of mental disorders and attrition in U.S. Army recruits.
Gubata ME; Oetting AA; Weber NS; Feng X; Cowan DN; Niebuhr DW
Mil Med; 2012 Apr; 177(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 22594126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Traits associated with personality disorders and adjustment to military life: predictive validity of self and peer reports.
Fiedler ER; Oltmanns TF; Turkheimer E
Mil Med; 2004 Mar; 169(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 15080240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP): temporal stability and predictive validity of the diagnostic scales.
Melley AH; Oltmanns TF; Turkheimer E
Assessment; 2002 Jun; 9(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 12066833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temperament, character, and personality disorders.
de la Rie SM; Duijsens IJ; Cloninger CR
J Pers Disord; 1998; 12(4):362-72. PubMed ID: 9891290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Brief Self-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BSRF).
Kotelnikova Y; Clark LA; Vernon PA; Hayden EP
Assessment; 2015 Feb; 22(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 24847163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo Evaluation of Two-Level Logistic Regression for Assessing Person Fit.
Woods CM
Multivariate Behav Res; 2008; 43(1):50-76. PubMed ID: 26788972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathology versus statistical infrequency: potential sources of gender bias in personality disorder criteria.
Anderson KG; Sankis LM; Widiger TA
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2001 Oct; 189(10):661-8. PubMed ID: 11708666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised in an outpatient sample.
Fossati A; Cloninger CR; Villa D; Borroni S; Grazioli F; Giarolli L; Battaglia M; Maffei C
Compr Psychiatry; 2007; 48(4):380-7. PubMed ID: 17560961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): development, factor structure, reliability, and validity.
Verheul R; Andrea H; Berghout CC; Dolan C; Busschbach JJ; van der Kroft PJ; Bateman AW; Fonagy P
Psychol Assess; 2008 Mar; 20(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 18315396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of MCMI-II and 16PF validity scales.
Grossman LS; Craig RJ
J Pers Assess; 1995 Apr; 64(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 7722863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparability of self- and other-rated personality structure.
Nuzum H; Ready RE; Clark LA
Psychol Assess; 2019 Jun; 31(6):741-750. PubMed ID: 30730190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the big-five factor structure across samples of Chinese and American adults.
Trull TJ; Geary DC
J Pers Assess; 1997 Oct; 69(2):324-41. PubMed ID: 9392894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving assessment of personality disorder traits through social network analysis.
Clifton A; Turkheimer E; Oltmanns TF
J Pers; 2007 Oct; 75(5):1007-31. PubMed ID: 17760855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
