These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1855798)

  • 1. Application of digital image analysis in dental radiography for the description of periapical bone lesions: a preliminary study.
    Mol A; van der Stelt PF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):357-9. PubMed ID: 1855798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital image analysis for the diagnosis of periapical bone lesions: a preliminary study.
    Mol A; van der Stelt PF
    Int Endod J; 1989 Nov; 22(6):299-302. PubMed ID: 2639874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of computer-aided image interpretation to the diagnosis of periapical bone lesions.
    Mol A; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Nov; 21(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 1299632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
    Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided interpretation and quantification of angular periodontal bone defects on dental radiographs.
    van der Stelt PF; Geraets WG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 1855794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study.
    Kullendorff B; Petersson K; Rohlin M
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Aug; 13(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 9550045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
    Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using direct digital imaging.
    Meier AW; Brown CE; Miles DA; Analoui M
    J Endod; 1996 Oct; 22(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 9198437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of digital radiography and radiodensitometry in evaluation of chronic fibrous periapical changes of endodontically untreated teeth.
    Czelej-Górski J; Rózyło TK; Rózyło-Kalinowska I
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2001; 56():111-8. PubMed ID: 11977296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of virtual simulation platform for investigation of the radiographic features of periapical bone lesion.
    Gao Y; Haapasalo M; Shen Y; Wu H; Jiang H; Zhou X
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1404-9. PubMed ID: 20647106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two different direct digital radiography systems for the ability to detect artificially prepared periapical lesions.
    Folk RB; Thorpe JR; McClanahan SB; Johnson JD; Strother JM
    J Endod; 2005 Apr; 31(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 15793390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bony lesions.
    Bender IB
    J Endod; 1997 Jan; 23(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 9594738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image processing for enhanced observer agreement in the evaluation of periapical bone changes.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Bragger U; Patrikiou A; Stassinakis A; Lang NP
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):615-22. PubMed ID: 12190901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image analysis of intraoral radiographs.
    Nummikoski PV
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 12046405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions.
    Paurazas SB; Geist JR; Pink FE; Hoen MM; Steiman HR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 10710463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic detectability of periodontal diseases. A comparison of perapical radiography with detailed zonography.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Rosberg J; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8617393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.