These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18559022)

  • 1. Accounting for intraclass correlations and controlling for baseline differences in a cluster-randomised evidence-based practice intervention study.
    Xie XJ; Titler MG; Clarke WR
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2008; 5(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 18559022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based postoperative pain management in nursing: is a randomized-controlled trial the most appropriate design?
    Seers K; Crichton N; Carroll D; Richards S; Saunders T
    J Nurs Manag; 2004 May; 12(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 15089956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing appropriate analysis methods for cluster randomised cross-over trials with a binary outcome.
    Morgan KE; Forbes AB; Keogh RH; Jairath V; Kahan BC
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):318-333. PubMed ID: 27680896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of methods for analysing cluster randomized trials: an example involving a factorial design.
    Peters TJ; Richards SH; Bankhead CR; Ades AE; Sterne JA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Oct; 32(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 14559762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of cluster randomized trials with repeated cross-sectional binary measurements.
    Ukoumunne OC; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(3):417-33. PubMed ID: 11180311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
    Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designing psycho-oncology randomised trials and cluster randomised trials: variance components and intra-cluster correlation of commonly used psychosocial measures.
    Bell ML; McKenzie JE
    Psychooncology; 2013 Aug; 22(8):1738-47. PubMed ID: 23080401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study protocol of a randomised controlled group trial of client and care outcomes in the residential dementia care setting.
    Chenoweth L; King M; Luscombe G; Forbes I; Jeon YH; Parbury JS; Brodaty H; Fleming R; Haas M
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2011 Sep; 8(3):153-65. PubMed ID: 20942820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal modeling in community randomized trials with rare events: Utilization of the negative binomial regression model.
    Westgate PM; Cheng DM; Feaster DJ; Fernández S; Shoben AB; Vandergrift N
    Clin Trials; 2022 Apr; 19(2):162-171. PubMed ID: 34991359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers to the management of pain in dementia care.
    Bruneau B
    Nurs Times; 2014 Jul 9-15; 110(28):12, 14-6. PubMed ID: 25087440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The stepped wedge design].
    Dekkers OM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(9):A4069. PubMed ID: 22373553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Therapist effects in randomised controlled trials: what to do about them.
    Walters SJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2010 Apr; 19(7-8):1102-12. PubMed ID: 20492055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
    Nixon RM; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a primary care based intervention to improve the quality of life of osteoarthritis patients. The PraxArt-project: a cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN87252339].
    Rosemann T; Körner T; Wensing M; Gensichen J; Muth C; Joos S; Szecsenyi J
    BMC Public Health; 2005 Jul; 5():77. PubMed ID: 16029495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.