170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18560880)
1. Using three objective criteria to examine pedometer guidelines for free-living individuals.
Macfarlane DJ; Chan D; Chan KL; Ho EY; Lee CC
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2008 Oct; 104(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 18560880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.
Tudor-Locke C; Ainsworth BE; Thompson RW; Matthews CE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Dec; 34(12):2045-51. PubMed ID: 12471314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Convergent validity of six methods to assess physical activity in daily life.
Macfarlane DJ; Lee CC; Ho EY; Chan KL; Chan D
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Nov; 101(5):1328-34. PubMed ID: 16825525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cadence Feedback With ECE PEDO to Monitor Physical Activity Intensity: A Pilot Study.
Ardic F; Göcer E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(10):e3025. PubMed ID: 26962822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing accelerometer, pedometer and a questionnaire for measuring physical activity in bronchiectasis: a validity and feasibility study?
O'Neill B; McDonough SM; Wilson JJ; Bradbury I; Hayes K; Kirk A; Kent L; Cosgrove D; Bradley JM; Tully MA
Respir Res; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28088206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population.
Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Omron HJ-720ITC pedometer under free-living conditions.
Silcott NA; Bassett DR; Thompson DL; Fitzhugh EC; Steeves JA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Sep; 43(9):1791-7. PubMed ID: 21311356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.
Le Masurier GC; Tudor-Locke C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):867-71. PubMed ID: 12750599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring physical activity during pregnancy.
Harrison CL; Thompson RG; Teede HJ; Lombard CB
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2011 Mar; 8():19. PubMed ID: 21418609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations.
Tudor-Locke C; Craig CL; Aoyagi Y; Bell RC; Croteau KA; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Ewald B; Gardner AW; Hatano Y; Lutes LD; Matsudo SM; Ramirez-Marrero FA; Rogers LQ; Rowe DA; Schmidt MD; Tully MA; Blair SN
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2011 Jul; 8():80. PubMed ID: 21798044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of accelerometer and pedometer measures of physical activity in boys and girls, ages 8-10 years.
Rowlands AV; Eston RG
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2005 Sep; 76(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 16270702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a commercially available pedometer used to promote physical activity as part of a national programme.
Clemes SA; O'Connell S; Rogan LM; Griffiths PL
Br J Sports Med; 2010 Dec; 44(16):1178-83. PubMed ID: 19474004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of youth pedometer-determined physical activity guidelines using receiver operator characteristic curves.
Laurson KR; Eisenmann JC; Welk GJ; Wickel EE; Gentile DA; Walsh DA
Prev Med; 2008 May; 46(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 18234326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Step counts and energy expenditure as estimated by pedometry during treadmill walking at different stride frequencies.
Nielson R; Vehrs PR; Fellingham GW; Hager R; Prusak KA
J Phys Act Health; 2011 Sep; 8(7):1004-13. PubMed ID: 21885892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of GT3X accelerometer and YAMAX pedometer steps/day in a free-living sample of overweight and obese adults.
Barriera TV; Tudor-Locke C; Champagne CM; Broyles ST; Johnson WD; Katzmarzyk PT
J Phys Act Health; 2013 Feb; 10(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 22821951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of pedometers to identify less active children and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity in the school setting.
Rush E; Coppinger T; Obolonkin V; Hinckson E; McGrath L; McLennan S; Graham D
J Sci Med Sport; 2012 May; 15(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 22154488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement between pedometer and accelerometer in measuring physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women.
Kinnunen TI; Tennant PW; McParlin C; Poston L; Robson SC; Bell R
BMC Public Health; 2011 Jun; 11():501. PubMed ID: 21703033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical activity monitoring in stroke: SenseWear Pro2 activity accelerometer versus Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometer.
Vanroy C; Vissers D; Cras P; Beyne S; Feys H; Vanlandewijck Y; Truijen S
Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(20):1695-703. PubMed ID: 24279597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of piezoelectric pedometer and accelerometer step counts.
Cruz J; Brooks D; Marques A
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2017 Apr; 57(4):426-433. PubMed ID: 26796079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons of four methods of estimating physical activity in adult women.
Leenders NYJM ; Sherman WM; Nagaraja HN
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jul; 32(7):1320-6. PubMed ID: 10912900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
