These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1856118)

  • 1. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: perceived accuracy and perceived memorial content manipulations.
    Furedy JJ; Posner RT; Vincent A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1991 Jul; 11(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 1856118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: potentially confounding and influencing factors.
    Vincent A; Furedy JJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 Sep; 13(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 1399752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychophysiological differentiation of deception: the effects of electrodermal lability and mode of responding on skin conductance and heart rate.
    Gödert HW; Rill HG; Vossel G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Feb; 40(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 11166108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Wilson SK; Orne MT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1981 Jun; 40(6):1118-25. PubMed ID: 7264879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: the effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items.
    Furedy JJ; Gigliotti F; Ben-Shakhar G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Oct; 18(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 7876035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The roles of deception, intention to deceive, and motivation to avoid detection in the psychophysiological detection of guilty knowledge.
    Furedy JJ; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Mar; 28(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 1946882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioral inhibition and electrodermal activity during deception.
    Pennebaker JW; Chew CH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1985 Nov; 49(5):1427-33. PubMed ID: 4078683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination.
    Gamer M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Apr; 76(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20114064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception?
    Kozel FA; Johnson KA; Laken SJ; Grenesko EL; Smith JA; Walker J; George MS
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 18633826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temperature effects on polygraph detection of concealed information.
    MacNeill AL; Bradley MT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 26435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information gain of psychophysiological detection of deception in forensic and screening settings.
    Honts CR; Schweinle W
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 19609667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: a meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data.
    Meijer EH; klein Selle N; Elber L; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Sep; 51(9):879-904. PubMed ID: 24916920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Guilty Knowledge Test and the modified Stroop task in detection of deception: an exploratory study.
    Engelhard IM; Merckelbach H; van den Hout MA
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Apr; 92(2):683-91. PubMed ID: 12785660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of countermeasures on the validity of the Concealed Information Test.
    Peth J; Suchotzki K; Gamer M
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Sep; 53(9):1429-40. PubMed ID: 27338719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retroactive memory interference: a potential countermeasure technique against psychophysiological knowledge detection methods.
    Gronau N; Elber L; Satran S; Breska A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Mar; 106():68-78. PubMed ID: 25676452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of perceived efficacy and prospect of success on detection in the Guilty Actions Test.
    Zvi L; Nachson I; Elaad E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 25543067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of repeated psychophysiological detection of deception testing.
    Dollins AB; Cestaro VL; Pettit DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 9729818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The comparison question polygraph test: a contrast of methods and scoring.
    Honts CR; Reavy R
    Physiol Behav; 2015 May; 143():15-26. PubMed ID: 25703188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychophysiological correlates of the misinformation effect.
    Volz K; Leonhart R; Stark R; Vaitl D; Ambach W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jul; 117():1-9. PubMed ID: 28400245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orienting versus inhibition in the Concealed Information Test: Different cognitive processes drive different physiological measures.
    klein Selle N; Verschuere B; Kindt M; Meijer E; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):579-90. PubMed ID: 26615984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.