These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1856126)
1. Activity of clindamycin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis from four UK centres. Reeves DS; Holt HA; Phillips I; King A; Miles RS; Paton R; Wise R; Andrews JM J Antimicrob Chemother; 1991 Apr; 27(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 1856126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inducible clindamycin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Adhikari RP; Shrestha S; Barakoti A; Amatya R BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Jul; 17(1):483. PubMed ID: 28693489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MIC and serum bactericidal activity of clindamycin against methicillin-resistant and -sensitive staphylococci. Lemmen S; Kropec A; Engels I; Busse A; Daschner FD Infection; 1993; 21(6):407-9. PubMed ID: 8132374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from patients at two main health facilities in Kabul, Afghanistan. Naimi HM; Rasekh H; Noori AZ; Bahaduri MA BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Nov; 17(1):737. PubMed ID: 29187146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative in vitro activity of linezolid and five other antimicrobials against nosocomial isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Metallidis S; Chatzidimitriou M; Nikolaidis P; Tsona A; Bisiklis A; Kollaras P; Tsiakiri E; Koumentaki E; Alexiou-Daniel S J Chemother; 2003 Oct; 15(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 14603881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Erythromycin-induced resistance to clindamycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Marr JK; Lim AT; Yamamoto LG Hawaii Med J; 2005 Jan; 64(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 15751751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of T-3912, a novel non-fluorinated topical quinolone. Yamakawa T; Mitsuyama J; Hayashi K J Antimicrob Chemother; 2002 Mar; 49(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 11864945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of MLS(b) resistance among Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates carrying different SCCmec types. Teodoro CR; Mattos CS; Cavalcante FS; Pereira EM; dos Santos KR Microbiol Immunol; 2012 Sep; 56(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 22672011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nationwide Organism Susceptibility Patterns to Common Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics: What Are We Covering? Nodzo SR; Boyle KK; Frisch NB J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S302-S306. PubMed ID: 30745218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of methicillin and clindamycin resistance patterns in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a tertiary hospital in Turkey. Tekin A; Dal T; Deveci O; Tekin R; Atmaca S; Dayan S Infez Med; 2013 Jun; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 23774974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci: first results from Turkey. Azap OK; Arslan H; Timurkaynak F; Yapar G; Oruç E; Gagir U Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 Jul; 11(7):582-4. PubMed ID: 15966979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus at a tertiary care hospital: implications for clinical therapy. Saxena S; Singh T; Dutta R J Commun Dis; 2012 Jun; 44(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25151754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The rate of inducible clindamycin resistance and susceptibilities to other antimicrobial agents in staphylococci]. Oğuz VA; Yapar N; Sezak N; Cavuş SA; Kurutepe S; Peksel H; Cakir N; Yüce A Mikrobiyol Bul; 2009 Jan; 43(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 19334378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Antimicrobial activities of roxithromycin against recently obtained clinical isolates]. Igari J; Oguri T; Tachibana Y; Misawa N; Nakamura A; Shitara M; Umezu S; Nakamura Y; Tazawa S; Shimoura M; Ugajin K; Mori T; Shimada J; Kaku M; Murase M; Hirakata Y; Matsuda J Jpn J Antibiot; 1997 Jul; 50(7):640-9. PubMed ID: 9743909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of clindamycin resistance in erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin susceptible and methicillin-resistant clinical Staphylococcal isolates. Kader AA; Kumar A; Krishna A Saudi Med J; 2005 Dec; 26(12):1914-7. PubMed ID: 16380772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unusual susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, and tetracycline at 30 degrees C but not at 35 degrees C. Welch WD; Southern PM J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):831-3. PubMed ID: 6565708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Korea. Nam HM; Lee AL; Jung SC; Kim MN; Jang GC; Wee SH; Lim SK Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2011 Feb; 8(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 21034263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro activities of eight antibiotics against methicillin-resistant S. aureus and S. epidermidis strains isolated in Korea. Chang WH; Choi MS; Chung HY; Seo WJ; Choi TY; Chong YS; Kim JS; Chung SS; Hong SH J Korean Med Sci; 1988 Jun; 3(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 3267354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Failure of clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro. Siberry GK; Tekle T; Carroll K; Dick J Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Nov; 37(9):1257-60. PubMed ID: 14557972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcal isolates from different clinical specimens in western India. Pal N; Sharma B; Sharma R; Vyas L J Postgrad Med; 2010; 56(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 20739762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]