These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

612 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18561661)

  • 1. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
    Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of the intrinsic energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters for 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources relative to 60Co.
    Reed JL; Rasmussen BE; Davis SD; Micka JA; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122103. PubMed ID: 25471976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
    Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
    Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
    Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
    Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
    Hauri P; Schneider U
    Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance.
    Liuzzi R; Savino F; D'Avino V; Pugliese M; Cella L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139287. PubMed ID: 26427065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of phantom materials on the energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters exposed to 20-300 kV narrow x-ray spectra, 137Cs and 60Co photons.
    Massillon-J L G; Cabrera-Santiago A; Minniti R; O'Brien M; Soares CG
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4149-66. PubMed ID: 25004055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
    Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
    Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams.
    Mobit P; Agyingi E; Sandison G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Monte Carlo photon transport simulation in characterizing brachytherapy dosimeter energy-response artefacts.
    Das RK; Li Z; Perera H; Williamson JF
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Jun; 41(6):995-1006. PubMed ID: 8794480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10-150 keV monoenergetic photons.
    Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):334-6. PubMed ID: 16381741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality dependence of LiF TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments.
    Mobit PN; Mayles P; Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 8778821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo study of the quality dependence of diamond thermoluminescent dosimeters in radiotherapy beams.
    Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Oct; 42(10):1913-27. PubMed ID: 9364587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microdosimetric interpretation of the photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti detectors.
    Olko P; Bilski P; Kim JL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):119-22. PubMed ID: 12382842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response of LiF-TLD micro-rods around 125I radioactive seed.
    Mobit P; Badragan I
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):3129-42. PubMed ID: 14579856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Angular and radial dependence of the energy response factor for LIF-TLD micro-rods in 125L permanent implant source.
    Mobit P; Badragan I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):70-3. PubMed ID: 16782977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.