152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18561673)
1. Relationship between isotope half-life and prostatic edema for optimal prostate dose coverage in permanent seed implants.
Villeneuve M; Leclerc G; Lessard E; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1970-7. PubMed ID: 18561673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.
Yue N; Chen Z; Peschel R; Dicker AP; Waterman FM; Nath R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):1063-72. PubMed ID: 10571216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of the prescription dose for biradionuclide permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Nuttens VE; Lucas S
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5451-62. PubMed ID: 19175105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moving toward focal therapy in prostate cancer: dual-isotope permanent seed implants as a possible solution.
Todor DA; Barani IJ; Lin PS; Anscher MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):297-304. PubMed ID: 21536392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Isotope choice and the effect of edema on prostate brachytherapy dosimetry.
Butler WM; Merrick GS; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1067-75. PubMed ID: 10841411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prescription dose in permanent (131)Cs seed prostate implants.
Yue N; Heron DE; Komanduri K; Huq MS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2496-502. PubMed ID: 16193779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isotope selection for permanent prostate implants? An evaluation of 103Pd versus 125I based on radiobiological effectiveness and dosimetry.
Dicker AP; Lin CC; Leeper DB; Waterman FM
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 May; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 10875458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential impact of prostate edema on the dosimetry of permanent seed implants using the new 131Cs (model CS-1) seeds.
Chen Z; Deng J; Roberts K; Nath R
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):968-75. PubMed ID: 16696473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Edema-induced increase in tumour cell survival for 125I and 103Pd prostate permanent seed implants--a bio-mathematical model.
Yue N; Chen Z; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 47(7):1185-204. PubMed ID: 11996063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of edema, relative biological effectiveness, and dose heterogeneity on prostate brachytherapy.
Wang JZ; Mayr NA; Nag S; Montebello J; Gupta N; Samsami N; Kanellitsas C
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1025-32. PubMed ID: 16696479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of edema associated with 131Cs prostate permanent seed implants on dosimetric quality indices.
Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Beriwal S; Benoit RM; Smith RP
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3536-42. PubMed ID: 19746787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of edema on planning 125I and 103Pd prostate implants.
Yue N; Dicker AP; Nath R; Waterman FM
Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):763-7. PubMed ID: 10360539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the dose distribution for prostate implants using various 125I and 103Pd sources.
Meigooni AS; Luerman CM; Sowards KT
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1452-8. PubMed ID: 19472652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric effects of seed anisotropy and interseed attenuation for 103Pd and 125I prostate implants.
Chibani O; Williamson JF; Todor D
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2557-66. PubMed ID: 16193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of source batch S dispersion on dosimetry for prostate cancer treatment with permanent implants.
Nuñez-Cumplido E; Perez-Calatayud J; Casares-Magaz O; Hernandez-Armas J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4933-40. PubMed ID: 26233219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of low energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations to uncertainties in human tissue composition.
Landry G; Reniers B; Murrer L; Lutgens L; Gurp EB; Pignol JP; Keller B; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5188-98. PubMed ID: 21089752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dynamic model for the estimation of optimum timing of computed tomography scan for dose evaluation of 125I or 103Pd seed implant of prostate.
Yue N; Dicker AP; Corn BW; Nath R; Waterman FM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jan; 43(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 10030274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostatic edema in 125I permanent prostate implants: dynamical dosimetry taking volume changes into account.
Leclerc G; Lavallée MC; Roy R; Vigneault E; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):574-83. PubMed ID: 16878561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
