These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18561686)
1. Relationship between %dd(10)x and stopping-power ratios for flattening filter free accelerators: a Monte Carlo study. Xiong G; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2104-9. PubMed ID: 18561686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams. Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo-based investigations on the impact of removing the flattening filter on beam quality specifiers for photon beam dosimetry. Czarnecki D; Poppe B; Zink K Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 28369978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental validation of the dual parameter beam quality specifier for reference dosimetry in flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams. Simpson E; Gajewski R; Flower E; Stensmyr R Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(14):N271-81. PubMed ID: 26111099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Which accelerator photon beams are "clinic-like" for reference dosimetry purposes? Kalach NI; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1546-55. PubMed ID: 12906172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of the beam quality specifier for TomoTherapyHD treatment units. Howitz S; Schwedas M; Wiezorek T; Zink K Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 29031915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor. Muir BR; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter. Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing electron contamination for photon beam-quality specification. Li XA; Rogers DW Med Phys; 1994 Jun; 21(6):791-7. PubMed ID: 7935216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams. Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calculation of stopping-power ratios using realistic clinical electron beams. Ding GX; Rogers DW; Mackie TR Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 7643785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of stopping-power ratios in flattening-filter free beams. Ceberg C; Johnsson S; Lind M; Knöös T Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1164-8. PubMed ID: 20384253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between the TRS-398 code of practice and the TG-51 dosimetry protocol for flattening filter free beams. Lye JE; Butler DJ; Oliver CP; Alves A; Lehmann J; Gibbons FP; Williams IM Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):N362-72. PubMed ID: 27366933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of flattening filter free beams at low monitor unit settings. Akino Y; Ota S; Inoue S; Mizuno H; Sumida I; Yoshioka Y; Isohashi F; Ogawa K Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112101. PubMed ID: 24320454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo comparison of superficial dose between flattening filter free and flattened beams. Javedan K; Feygelman V; Zhang RR; Moros EG; Correa CR; Trotti A; Li W; Zhang GG Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 24662096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photon-beam subsource sensitivity to the initial electron-beam parameters. Fix MK; Keall PJ; Siebers JV Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1164-75. PubMed ID: 15895600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flattening filter free beams in SBRT and IMRT: dosimetric assessment of peripheral doses. Kragl G; Baier F; Lutz S; Albrich D; Dalaryd M; Kroupa B; Wiezorek T; Knöös T; Georg D Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 20888199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans. Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in energy spectra and water-to-material stopping-power ratios in three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated photon fields. Jang SY; Liu HH; Mohan R; Siebers JV Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1388-97. PubMed ID: 17500470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photon energy-modulated radiotherapy: Monte Carlo simulation and treatment planning study. Park JM; Kim JI; Heon Choi C; Chie EK; Kim IH; Ye SJ Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 22380358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]