These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18562156)

  • 1. Impingement as a mechanism of dissociation of a metasul metal-on-metal liner.
    Malik A; Dorr LD; Long WT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):323.e13-6. PubMed ID: 18562156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement.
    Williams D; Royle M; Norton M
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 18823742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary hip arthroplasty with 28-mm Metasul articulation.
    Dastane M; Wan Z; Deshmane P; Long WT; Dorr LD
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):662-4. PubMed ID: 20541891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty by using smartphone technology.
    Peters FM; Greeff R; Goldstein N; Frey CT
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Aug; 27(7):1324-30. PubMed ID: 22245126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: when does it matter?
    Maratt JD; Esposito CI; McLawhorn AS; Jerabek SA; Padgett DE; Mayman DJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Mar; 30(3):387-91. PubMed ID: 25453626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Utilization of Metal Augments Allows Better Biomechanical Reconstruction of the Hip in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Severe Acetabular Defects: A Comparative Study.
    Zhou B; Zhou Y; Yang D; Tang H; Shao H; Huang Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3724-3733. PubMed ID: 30243881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early results of total hip replacement with the Metasul metal-on-metal cementless prosthesis.
    Vigler M; Greental A; Kaminsky AJ; Shauer L; Salai M; Soudry M
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2010; 68(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20345355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do we medialise the hip centre of rotation in total hip arthroplasty? Influence of acetabular offset and surgical technique.
    Bonnin MP; Archbold PH; Basiglini L; Fessy MH; Beverland DE
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 22865253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of computed tomography-based navigation for revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Nakamura N; Nishii T; Kitada M; Iwana D; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1806-10. PubMed ID: 23523215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cementless cups do not increase osteolysis risk in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Apropos of 106 cases.
    Beldame J; Carreras F; Oger P; Beaufils P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 95(7):478-90. PubMed ID: 19801209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH
    Int Orthop; 2007 Aug; 31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S29-33. PubMed ID: 17661036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Radiologic evaluation of cup placement variation in conventional total hip arthroplasty].
    Leichtle U; Gosselke N; Wirth CJ; Rudert M
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17203443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
    Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Even the Intraoperative Knowledge of Femoral Stem Anteversion Cannot Prevent Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Weber M; Woerner ML; Sendtner E; Völlner F; Grifka J; Renkawitz TF
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2514-2519. PubMed ID: 27236745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.
    Long WT; Dastane M; Harris MJ; Wan Z; Dorr LD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):400-5. PubMed ID: 19727987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spontaneous dissociation of offset, face-changing polyethylene liners from the acetabular shell: a report of four cases.
    Gray CF; Moore RE; Lee GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(9):841-5. PubMed ID: 22552674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.