These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1856284)
1. Use of information technology for auditing effective use of laboratory services. Peters M; Broughton PM; Nightingale PG J Clin Pathol; 1991 Jul; 44(7):539-42. PubMed ID: 1856284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. External quality assessment of clinical laboratories in the United Kingdom. Whitehead TP; Woodford FP J Clin Pathol; 1981 Sep; 34(9):947-57. PubMed ID: 7024326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Quality improvement of medical diagnostic laboratories]. Horváth AR; Endröczi E; Mikó T Orv Hetil; 2003 Jul; 144(28):1389-95. PubMed ID: 12914124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The illusion of quality in quality management systems: meaningful accreditation. Phillips PK; Voak D; Smith K; Rowan RM; Lewis SM Transfus Med; 1994 Sep; 4(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 7820224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving, and auditing, access to clinical trial results. Goldacre B; Heneghan C BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g213. PubMed ID: 24429929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The CRABEL score--a method for auditing medical records. Crawford JR; Beresford TP; Lafferty KL Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Jan; 83(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11212456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality and accreditation in clinical chemistry laboratories analysis in the National Health Service. Davies K; Burnett D Analyst; 1997 Mar; 122(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 9158244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [A method for auditing medical records quality: audit of 467 medical records within the framework of the medical information systems project quality control]. Boulay F; Chevallier T; Gendreike Y; Mailland V; Joliot Y; Sambuc R Sante Publique; 1998 Mar; 10(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 9685806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accreditation of Individualized Quality Control Plans by the College of American Pathologists. Hoeltge GA Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):151-162. PubMed ID: 28153363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strategies to promote rational clinical chemistry test utilization. Hindmarsh JT; Lyon AW Clin Biochem; 1996 Aug; 29(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 8828959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical audit in the UK: does it have a future? Waise A Ann Clin Biochem; 1996 Sep; 33 ( Pt 5)():369-75. PubMed ID: 8888971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical pathology accreditation: standards for the medical laboratory. Burnett D; Blair C; Haeney MR; Jeffcoate SL; Scott KW; Williams DL J Clin Pathol; 2002 Oct; 55(10):729-33. PubMed ID: 12354795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced auditing techniques using a local area network. Robertson MJ Qual Assur; 1994 Mar; 3(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 7804609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Proficiency testing. Its role in a voluntary clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program. Duckworth JK Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):346-8. PubMed ID: 3355330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accreditation of clinical pathology laboratories in the United Kingdom: the story so far. Pennington GW J Clin Pathol; 1991 Jul; 44(7):615. PubMed ID: 1856300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A laboratorian's view on the College of American Pathologists' Laboratory Accreditation Program for Clinical Laboratories. Mark HF; Wells L Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 9558450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Satisfying regulatory and accreditation requirements for quality control. Ehrmeyer SS Clin Lab Med; 2013 Mar; 33(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 23331727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Costing of pathology services in the United Kingdom National Health Service. Dick HM J Clin Pathol; 1991 Sep; 44(9):705-9. PubMed ID: 1918396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]