BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18563095)

  • 1. Solutions, not scapegoats.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):957. PubMed ID: 18563095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repairing research integrity.
    Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leading by example.
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):229. PubMed ID: 17230151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stop ignoring misconduct.
    Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
    Sovacool BK
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A record made to be broken.
    Nature; 2013 Apr; 496(7443):5. PubMed ID: 23565534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Through the gaps.
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):335. PubMed ID: 23002451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publish or perish in China.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists behaving badly.
    Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The changing face of scientific misconduct.
    Bevan D
    Clin Invest Med; 2004 Jun; 27(3):117-9. PubMed ID: 15305801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. China fights fraud with tough tactics and integrity training.
    Michel MC
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7283):877. PubMed ID: 20164904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time is right to confront misconduct.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):7. PubMed ID: 22859166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doubts over biochemist's data expose holes in Japanese fraud laws.
    Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):514. PubMed ID: 16452938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peers nip misconduct in the bud.
    Koocher GP; Keith-Spiegel P
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):438-40. PubMed ID: 20651674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research integrity: Sabotage!
    Maher B
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):516-8. PubMed ID: 20881988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.