These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18563095)

  • 21. Higher education: Call for a European integrity standard.
    Mungiu-Pippidi A; Deca L
    Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7423):192. PubMed ID: 23135459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct.
    Vences M; Zardoya R
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
    Interlandi J
    N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Publish or perish.
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7552):259. PubMed ID: 25993920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Need for a court to rule on patents and misconduct.
    Bihain BE
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):875. PubMed ID: 12931157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. To tell or not to tell? The ethical dilemma of the would-be whistleblower.
    Malek J
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):115-29. PubMed ID: 20461568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Japan ponders steps to probe data errors.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):348. PubMed ID: 12459746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. One in three scientists confesses to having sinned.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):718-9. PubMed ID: 15944656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle.
    Yong E; Ledford H; Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7477):454-7. PubMed ID: 24284713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting.
    Fanelli D
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):149. PubMed ID: 23407504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retraction record rocks community.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):346-7. PubMed ID: 22996524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misconduct mayhem.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):122-3. PubMed ID: 16721916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The data detective. Interview by Ed Yong.
    Simonsohn U
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7405):18-9. PubMed ID: 22763527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Whistle-blower claims his accusations cost him his job.
    Reich ES
    Nature; 2011 Jun; 474(7350):140-1. PubMed ID: 21654778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Want research integrity? Stop the blame game.
    Macleod M
    Nature; 2021 Nov; 599(7886):533. PubMed ID: 34819677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
    Powell K
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Purdue dogged by misconduct claims.
    Reich ES
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):238-9. PubMed ID: 17507941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):728-9. PubMed ID: 12490902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mystery fraud accusations.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7319):1020. PubMed ID: 20981065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.