638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18563131)
21. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A record made to be broken.
Nature; 2013 Apr; 496(7443):5. PubMed ID: 23565534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Mentoring the mentors: the Yoda factor in promoting scientific integrity.
Motta MM
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):W17. PubMed ID: 12778934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Do researchers learn to overlook misbehavior?
Heitman E; Anestidou L; Olsen C; Bulger RE
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):49. PubMed ID: 16295264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Through the gaps.
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):335. PubMed ID: 23002451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity.
Adams D; Pimple KD
Account Res; 2005; 12(3):225-40. PubMed ID: 16634173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Japan ponders steps to probe data errors.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):348. PubMed ID: 12459746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Meeting targets lab lapses.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2013 May; 497(7449):300-1. PubMed ID: 23676733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of culture in research misconduct.
Davis MS
Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ethics: More research won't crack misconduct.
Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
Nature; 2017 Aug; 548(7665):31. PubMed ID: 28770833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Higher education: Call for a European integrity standard.
Mungiu-Pippidi A; Deca L
Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7423):192. PubMed ID: 23135459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Misconduct: pressure to achieve corrodes ideals.
Breitling LP
Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7051):626. PubMed ID: 16079817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
Powell K
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
Bentley P
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth.
Dalton R
Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):728-9. PubMed ID: 12490902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Recognition could support a science code of conduct.
Ropert-Coudert Y
Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):259. PubMed ID: 17507959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
Soskolne CL
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Ethics and fraud.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):117-8. PubMed ID: 16407910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
