253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18563431)
1. The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.
Nevalainen J; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Vonthein R; Johnson CA; Schiefer U
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 246(9):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18563431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quantification of isopters using semiautomated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in glaucoma patients with advanced retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss].
Nowomiejska K; Rejdak R; Zarnowski T; Krapp E; Paetzold J; Schiefer U; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):228-30. PubMed ID: 15510508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.
Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry provides additional information to static automated perimetry in the assessment of the remaining visual field in end-stage glaucoma.
Nowomiejska K; Wrobel-Dudzinska D; Ksiazek K; Ksiazek P; Rejdak K; Maciejewski R; Juenemann AG; Rejdak R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25444538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm (program k) for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Takada S; Arimura-Koike E; Shimomura Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 56(3):2092-9. PubMed ID: 25744980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reaction time during semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in patients with advanced visual field loss.
Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 88(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 19094165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in isopter position and fatigue during semi-automated kinetic perimetry.
Nowomiejska K; Brzozowska A; Zarnowski T; Rejdak R; Weleber RG; Schiefer U
Ophthalmologica; 2012; 227(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 22205248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Periphery kinetic perimetry: clinically feasible to complement central static perimetry.
Ma X; Tang L; Chen X; Zeng L
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):343. PubMed ID: 34551740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Octopus 900 Automated Kinetic Perimetry versus Standard Automated Static Perimetry in Glaucoma Practice.
Rowe FJ; Czanner G; Somerville T; Sood I; Sood D
Curr Eye Res; 2021 Jan; 46(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 32564629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of the Visual Field Loss in Retinitis Pigmentosa Using Semi-Automated Kinetic Perimetry.
Nowomiejska K; Brzozowska A; Koss MJ; Weleber RG; Schiefer U; Rejdak K; Juenemann AG; Maciejewski R; Rejdak R
Curr Eye Res; 2016 Jul; 41(7):993-8. PubMed ID: 26470834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of semiautomated versus manual Goldmann kinetic perimetry in patients with visually significant glaucoma.
Ramirez AM; Chaya CJ; Gordon LK; Giaconi JA
J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18344756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry.
Vonthein R; Rauscher S; Paetzold J; Nowomiejska K; Krapp E; Hermann A; Sadowski B; Chaumette C; Wild JM; Schiefer U
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17331580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Cello KE; Nelson-Quigg JM; Johnson CA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 10704546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning effect and repeatability of automated kinetic perimetry in healthy participants.
Hirasawa K; Shoji N
Curr Eye Res; 2014 Sep; 39(9):928-37. PubMed ID: 24588228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning effect and test-retest variability of pulsar perimetry.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Brusini P
J Glaucoma; 2013 Mar; 22(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22027935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of static automated perimetry and semi-automated kinetic perimetry in patients with bilateral visible optic nerve head drusen.
Nowomiejska K; Rejdak R; Zagorski Z; Zarnowski T
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 87(7):801-5. PubMed ID: 18721249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
