BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18564094)

  • 21. Turning words into numbers: establishing an empirical cut score for a letter graded examination.
    Burch VC; Norman GR
    Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):442-6. PubMed ID: 18608946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient-centered interviewing and student performance in a comprehensive clinical skills examination: is there an association?
    Rouf E; Chumley H; Dobbie A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Apr; 75(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19013743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accurately assessing candidates for general practice.
    Jones R
    Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):225-7. PubMed ID: 19350073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhancing the defensibility of examiners' marks in high stake OSCEs.
    Shulruf B; Damodaran A; Jones P; Kennedy S; Mangos G; O'Sullivan AJ; Rhee J; Taylor S; Velan G; Harris P
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jan; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 29304806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of 'borderline' clinical competence using generalisability and decision studies in dental skills training.
    Kropmans TJ; Cosić K
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 Aug; 8(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 15233777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is a web-based concordance test feasible to assess therapeutic decision-making skills in a French context?
    Sibert L; Giorgi R; Dahamna B; Doucet J; Charlin B; Darmoni SJ
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e162-8. PubMed ID: 19404888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MOR: a simulation-based assessment centre for evaluating the personal and interpersonal qualities of medical school candidates.
    Ziv A; Rubin O; Moshinsky A; Gafni N; Kotler M; Dagan Y; Lichtenberg D; Mekori YA; Mittelman M
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):991-8. PubMed ID: 18823518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A change to pass/fail grading.
    Wilkinson T
    Acad Med; 2009 Dec; 84(12):1643. PubMed ID: 19940562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.
    Ricketts C; Freeman AC; Coombes LR
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19493184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Profiling students for remediation using latent class analysis.
    Boscardin CK
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Mar; 17(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 21487932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Problematizing the concept of the "borderline" group in performance assessments.
    Homer M; Pell G; Fuller R
    Med Teach; 2017 May; 39(5):469-475. PubMed ID: 28440718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of progress tests.
    McHarg J; Bradley P; Chamberlain S; Ricketts C; Searle J; McLachlan JC
    Med Educ; 2005 Feb; 39(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 15679690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preclinical predictors of surgery NBME exam performance.
    Kozar RA; Kao LS; Miller CC; Schenarts KD
    J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(2):204-7. PubMed ID: 17509265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The second time around: accounting for retest effects on oral examinations.
    Raymond MR; Luciw-Dubas UA
    Eval Health Prof; 2010 Sep; 33(3):386-403. PubMed ID: 20801978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What is the educational impact of standards-based assessment in a medical degree?
    Wilkinson TJ; Wells JE; Bushnell JA
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 17518836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of standard-setting procedures for an OSCE in undergraduate medical education.
    Kaufman DM; Mann KV; Muijtjens AM; van der Vleuten CP
    Acad Med; 2000 Mar; 75(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 10724316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sharpening the eye of the OSCE with critical action analysis.
    Payne NJ; Bradley EB; Heald EB; Maughan KL; Michaelsen VE; Wang XQ; Corbett EC
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 18820517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From behaviours to attributions: further concerns regarding the evaluation of professionalism.
    Ginsburg S; Regehr G; Mylopoulos M
    Med Educ; 2009 May; 43(5):414-25. PubMed ID: 19422488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.
    Bandaranayake RC
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19117221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.