These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1856413)
1. Contrast controversy: more to it than meets the eye. Brinker JA J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Aug; 18(2):451-3. PubMed ID: 1856413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Another step toward resolving the contrast controversy. Moliterno DJ; Topol EJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 May; 27(6):1387-9. PubMed ID: 8626948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of contrast media on thrombus formation during coronary angioplasty. Gasperetti CM; Feldman MD; Burwell LR; Angello DA; Haugh KH; Owen RM; Powers ER J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Aug; 18(2):443-50. PubMed ID: 1856412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute occlusion of coronary artery bypass graft with nonionic contrast medium. Tomizawa Y; Endo M; Nishida H; Koyanagi H Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Apr; 50(4):181-3. PubMed ID: 11993202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Percutaneous coronary angioscopic comparison of thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary angioplasty with ionic and nonionic low osmolality contrast media in unstable angina. Qureshi NR; den Heijer P; Crijns HJ Am J Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 80(6):700-4. PubMed ID: 9315572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (Ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty. Schräder R; Esch I; Ensslen R; Fach WA; Merle H; Scherer D; Sievert H; Spies HF; Zeplin HE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 33(2):395-402. PubMed ID: 9973019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial of low osmolar ionic versus nonionic contrast media in patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Grines CL; Schreiber TL; Savas V; Jones DE; Zidar FJ; Gangadharan V; Brodsky M; Levin R; Safian R; Puchrowicz-Ochocki S; Castellani MD; O'Neill WW J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 May; 27(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 8626947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of thrombosis during coronary angioplasty with low osmolality contrast media. Esplugas E; Cequier A; Jara F; Mauri J; Soler T; Sala J; Sabate X Am J Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 68(10):1020-4. PubMed ID: 1927914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship of anticoagulation and radiographic contrast agents to thrombosis during coronary angiography and angioplasty: are there real concerns? Hill JA; Grabowski EF Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Mar; 25(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 1571975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of anticoagulation on ionic and nonionic contrast media effect on thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis: The PEPCIT study. Bellemain-Appaix A; Beygui F; Lesty C; Gupta S; Silvain J; Le Feuvre C; Cayla G; Allali Y; Montalescot G; Collet JP Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 79(5):823-33. PubMed ID: 21618678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast media injection into right coronary artery caused thrombus extraction to aorta that may have resulted in left main trunk thrombosis. Ikeda A; Inagaki M; Fukuzawa S; Sugioka J; Okino S; Maekawa J; Maekawa S; Ichikawa S; Uchiyama T; Kamioka N; Kuroiwa N Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2012 Jan; 27(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 24122640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Catastrophic thrombus development despite systemic heparinization during coronary angioplasty: possible relationship to nonionic contrast. Doorey AJ; Stillabower ME; Gale N; Goldenberg EM Clin Cardiol; 1992 Feb; 15(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 1737403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast media: is there a preferable agent for coronary interventions? Davidson CJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Apr; 29(5):1122-3. PubMed ID: 9120170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ionic or non-ionic contrast media during coronary intervention: does it make a difference? Legrand V Eur Heart J; 2001 Mar; 22(5):353-4. PubMed ID: 11207074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiac events after low osmolar ionic or isosmolar nonionic contrast media utilization in the current era of coronary angioplasty. Le Feuvre C; Batisse A; Collet JP; Batisse JP; Choussat R; Beygui F; Helft G; Montalescot G; Metzger JP Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jun; 67(6):852-8. PubMed ID: 16649230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Profound platelet degranulation is an important side effect of some types of contrast media used in interventional cardiology. Chronos NA; Goodall AH; Wilson DJ; Sigwart U; Buller NP Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):2035-44. PubMed ID: 8222096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast agents on contrast-induced nephropathy and tissue reperfusion in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction [CONTRAST-AMI] Trial). Bolognese L; Falsini G; Schwenke C; Grotti S; Limbruno U; Liistro F; Carrera A; Angioli P; Picchi A; Ducci K; Pierli C Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jan; 109(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 21943940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of contrast media and technical factors to the safety of invasive procedures. Marzilli M Semin Hematol; 1991 Oct; 28(4 Suppl 7):11-4; discussion 15. PubMed ID: 1822604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]