These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18564131)
1. Does topical haemostatic agent have an adverse effect on the function of the prostatic neurovascular bundle? Zeltser I; Dugi D; Gupta A; Park S; Kabbani W; Cadeddu J BJU Int; 2008 Sep; 102(8):1005-7. PubMed ID: 18564131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy is quantitatively related to the response to intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation. Rabbani F; Patel M; Cozzi P; Mulhall JP; Scardino PT BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19338540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical and electrophysiological assessment of the canine periprostatic neurovascular anatomy: perspectives as a nerve sparing radical prostatectomy model. Gianduzzo TR; Colombo JR; El-Gabry E; Haber GP; Gill IS J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):2025-9. PubMed ID: 18355844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visualization of the neurovascular bundles and major pelvic ganglion with fluorescent tracers after penile injection in the rat. Davila HH; Mamcarz M; Nadelhaft I; Salup R; Lockhart J; Carrion RE BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(8):1048-51. PubMed ID: 18070171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Labanaris AP; Zugor V; Takriti S; Smiszek R; Engelhard K; Nutzel R; Kuhn R Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18759166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance of electrostimulation in detecting neurovascular bundle during radical prostatectomy. Tsujimura A; Miyagawa Y; Takao T; Matsumiya K; Nakayama M; Tsujimoto Y; Takaha N; Nishimura K; Nonomura N; Takada T; Fujioka H; Kurokawa K; Aozasa K; Okuyama A Int J Urol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):926-31. PubMed ID: 16882057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing. Finley DS; Rodriguez E; Skarecky DW; Ahlering TE BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(10):1484-9. PubMed ID: 19388985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. Takenaka A; Murakami G; Soga H; Han SH; Arai Y; Fujisawa M J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1032-5. PubMed ID: 15311031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The development of a rat model of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: preliminary findings. Kaufmann O; Claro J; Cury J; Andrade E; Longo B; Aguiar W; Mello L; Srougi M BJU Int; 2008 Sep; 102(8):1026-8. PubMed ID: 18485030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laser robotically assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a pilot study of technical feasibility in the canine model. Gianduzzo T; Colombo JR; Haber GP; Hafron J; Magi-Galluzzi C; Aron M; Gill IS; Kaouk JH BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 18694410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovery of erectile function after unilateral and bilateral cavernous nerve interposition grafting during radical pelvic surgery. Satkunasivam R; Appu S; Al-Azab R; Hersey K; Lockwood G; Lipa J; Fleshner NE J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1258-63. PubMed ID: 19152922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model. Ong AM; Su LM; Varkarakis I; Inagaki T; Link RE; Bhayani SB; Patriciu A; Crain B; Walsh PC J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1318-22. PubMed ID: 15371832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advances in imaging the neurovascular bundle. Rai S; Srivastava A; Sooriakumaran P; Tewari A Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Mar; 22(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 22273757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy? Marien TP; Lepor H BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Evicel to cavernous nerves of the rat does not influence erectile function in vivo. Bivalacqua TJ; Guzzo TJ; Schaeffer EM; Gebska MA; Champion HC; Burnett AL; Gonzalgo ML Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1169-73. PubMed ID: 18561990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nerve grafting at the time of radical prostatectomy: should we be doing it? Mancuso P; Rashid P ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):859-63. PubMed ID: 18959637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]