These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18564493)

  • 1. Proxy consent to research: the legal landscape.
    Saks ER; Dunn LB; Wimer J; Gonzales M; Kim S
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2008; 8(1):37-92. PubMed ID: 18564493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical surrogacy mediation: expanding patient, family, and physician rights and reformulating the Virginia Health Care Decisions Act.
    Moore DJ
    Va J Soc Policy Law; 2003; 10(3):410-44. PubMed ID: 15744904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research oversight and adults with cognitive impairment.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 14983552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulating research with decisionally impaired individuals: are we making progress?
    Hoffmann DE; Schwartz J; DeRenzo EG
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2000; 3(3-4):547-608. PubMed ID: 16594106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision making by surrogates.
    Day LJ
    Crit Care Nurse; 2000 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 11873744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed consent for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: a survey of clinical investigators.
    Karlawish JH; Knopman D; Clark CM; Morris JC; Marson D; Whitehouse PJ; Kawas CH
    IRB; 2002; 24(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 12737167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appointing a proxy for research consent after one develops dementia: the need for further study.
    Kim SY; Kieburtz K
    Neurology; 2006 May; 66(9):1298-9. PubMed ID: 16682657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research involving cognitively impaired adults.
    Karlawish JH
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Apr; 348(14):1389-92. PubMed ID: 12672869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical considerations for research in critically ill patients.
    Bigatello LM; George E; Hurford WE
    Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S178-81. PubMed ID: 12626965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quebec physicians' knowledge and opinions regarding substitute consent for decisionally incapacitated older adults.
    Bravo G; Dubois MF; Paquet M; Langlois F; Bernier JP
    IRB; 2004; 26(5):12-7. PubMed ID: 15658013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decisionmaking at the end of life: patients with Alzheimer's or other dementias.
    Francis LP
    Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):539-92. PubMed ID: 15119319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity.
    Swidler RN
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proxy consent to participation of the decisionally impaired in medical resesarch--Maryland's policy initiative.
    Hoffman DE; Schwartz J
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):123-53. PubMed ID: 15573434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician-assisted suicide: a "right" reserved for only the competent?
    Donahue JW
    Vt Law Rev; 1995; 19():795-842. PubMed ID: 16086485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives.
    Kim SY; Appelbaum PS
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 16883617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legal mind field. English law states that doctors alone make the decision to administer medical treatment to patients with diminished mental capacity. But a new alliance aims to put an end to this.
    Carlisle D
    Health Serv J; 2002 Aug; 112(5820):14. PubMed ID: 12356016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. California's new law allowing surrogate consent for clinical research involving subjects with impaired decision-making capacity.
    Luce JM
    Intensive Care Med; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1024-5. PubMed ID: 12861989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health care surrogate statutes: ethics pitfalls threaten the interests of incompetent patients.
    Krupp AN
    West VA Law Rev; 1998; 101(1):99-128. PubMed ID: 12774805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. State court says informed consent procedures were unacceptable.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 May; 15(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11917932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.