These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18566807)

  • 1. Effects of spatiotopic factors on bisection of radial lines.
    Chieffi S; Iavarone A; Carlomagno S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 189(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 18566807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors.
    Chieffi S; Messina G; Villano I; Messina A; Ilardi CR; Monda M; Salerno M; Sessa F; Mollica MP; Cavaliere G; Trinchese G; Cimmino F; Murabito P; Catapano A; Monda V
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2200. PubMed ID: 30483201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional bias in the radial and vertical dimensions of space.
    Chieffi S; Castaldi C; Di Maio G; La Marra M; Messina A; Monda V; Villano I
    C R Biol; 2019; 342(3-4):97-100. PubMed ID: 31036514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial attentional bias in normal people: object or viewer-centered.
    Drago V; Crucian GP; FitzGerald DB; Jeong Y; Finney GR; Heilman KM
    Cortex; 2008 Feb; 44(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 18387549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual field influence on radial line bisection.
    Geldmacher DS; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Sep; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 7986493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual Differences in the Flexibility of Peripersonal Space.
    Hunley SB; Marker AM; Lourenco SF
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 28219262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools: evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments.
    Gamberini L; Seraglia B; Priftis K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1298-304. PubMed ID: 18242649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focused visual attention distorts distance perception away from the attentional locus.
    Wardak C; Denève S; Ben Hamed S
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 21147135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved visual sensitivity in the perihand space.
    Dufour A; Touzalin P
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 18553071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection.
    Arduino LS; Previtali P; Girelli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.
    Chieffi S; Iavarone A; Iaccarino L; La Marra M; Messina G; De Luca V; Monda M
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 232(11):3659-64. PubMed ID: 25092273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between spatial cognition and walking trajectory for passing through a doorway: evident in individuals with dominant right eye?
    Kitayama S; Fujikake H; Kokubu M; Higuchi T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):797-807. PubMed ID: 25432626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of stimulus proximity on judgments of spatial relationships in patients with chronic unilateral right or left hemisphere stroke.
    Williamson JB; Haque S; Burtis B; Harciarek M; Lamb D; Zilli E; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 25350787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric asymmetries in perceived depth revealed through a radial line bisection task.
    Szpak A; Thomas NA; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):807-13. PubMed ID: 26645309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.