These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18566807)

  • 21. When the whole is more than the sum of the parts: evidence from visuospatial neglect.
    Gallace A; Imbornone E; Vallar G
    J Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 2(2):387-413. PubMed ID: 19824178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visuospatial neglect in near and far space: dissociation between line bisection and letter cancellation.
    Keller I; Schindler I; Kerkhoff G; von Rosen F; Golz D
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):724-31. PubMed ID: 15721185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Furukawa T; Tsukagoshi H
    Brain; 1989 Dec; 112 ( Pt 6)():1485-502. PubMed ID: 2597992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contributions of object- and space-based mechanisms to line bisection errors.
    Post RB; Caufield KJ; Welch RB
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(8):856-64. PubMed ID: 11369408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional bias in normal subjects performing visual and tactile radial line bisections.
    Chewning J; Adair JC; Heilman EB; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Nov; 36(11):1097-101. PubMed ID: 9842756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radial bisection of words and lines in right-brain-damaged patients with spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Girelli L; Vallar G
    J Neuropsychol; 2017 Sep; 11(3):396-413. PubMed ID: 26611497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Right fronto-parietal dysfunction underlying spatial attention in bipolar disorder.
    Najt P; Bayer U; Hausmann M
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 23916624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space.
    Garza JP; Eslinger PJ; Barrett AM
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 18381226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stimulus context in hemineglect.
    Marshall RS; Lazar RM; Krakauer JW; Sharma R
    Brain; 1998 Oct; 121 ( Pt 10)():2003-10. PubMed ID: 9798752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radial character-line bisection.
    Jeong Y; Drago V; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2006 Jun; 19(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 16783133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations.
    Weiss PH; Marshall JC; Wunderlich G; Tellmann L; Halligan PW; Freund HJ; Zilles K; Fink GR
    Brain; 2000 Dec; 123 Pt 12():2531-41. PubMed ID: 11099454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monocular patching may induce ipsilateral "where" spatial bias.
    Chen P; Erdahl L; Barrett AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):711-6. PubMed ID: 19100274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Far bias on the radial line bisection task: measuring perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in normal subjects.
    Barrett AM; Crosson JB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Cortex; 2002 Dec; 38(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 12507045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia?
    Kuhn C; Rosenthal A; Bublak P; Grotemeyer KH; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?
    Dolores de Hevia M; Girelli L; Vallar G
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):254-64. PubMed ID: 16044296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aging effects on extrapersonal (far-space) attention: cancellation and line bisection performance from 179 healthy adults.
    Morse H; Jolly AA; Browning H; Clark A; Pomeroy V; Rossit S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2024 Jul; 31(4):605-626. PubMed ID: 37314105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    Butler BC; Eskes GA; Vandorpe RA
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(3):346-58. PubMed ID: 14670573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Length perception and production of normal subjects in proximal versus distal peripersonal space.
    Kwon JC; Lee BH; Ji JM; Jeong Y; Kim BJ; Heilman KM; Na DL
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2004 Oct; 10(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 15637784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.
    Park GD; Reed CL
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2977-88. PubMed ID: 26126805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.