BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18566998)

  • 1. Does lowering the screening age for cervical cancer in The Netherlands make sense?
    van der Aa MA; de Kok IM; Siesling S; van Ballegooijen M; Coebergh JW
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Sep; 123(6):1403-6. PubMed ID: 18566998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
    van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
    Hristova L; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cancer in the Netherlands 1989-1998: Decrease of squamous cell carcinoma in older women, increase of adenocarcinoma in younger women.
    Bulk S; Visser O; Rozendaal L; Verheijen RH; Meijer CJ
    Int J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 113(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15515017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
    Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.
    Bos AB; Rebolj M; Habbema JD; van Ballegooijen M
    Int J Cancer; 2006 Nov; 119(10):2372-5. PubMed ID: 16858676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Population-based Study of Invasive Cervical Cancer Patients in Beijing: 1993-2008.
    Wang T; Wu MH; Wu YM; Zhang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Dec; 128(24):3298-304. PubMed ID: 26668143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in incidence of and mortality from invasive cancer of the uterine cervix in Scotland (1975-1994).
    Walker JJ; Brewster D; Gould A; Raab GM
    Public Health; 1998 Nov; 112(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 9883033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cancer screening and the older woman: obstacles and opportunities.
    Brooks SE
    Cancer Pract; 1996; 4(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8826140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in cervical cancer mortality in Korea 1993-2002: corrected mortality using national death certification data and national cancer incidence data.
    Shin HR; Park S; Hwang SY; Kim JE; Jung KW; Won YJ; Hwang SS; Yim SH; Choi KS; Park EC; Park SY; Kim JW; Lee HP
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Jan; 122(2):393-7. PubMed ID: 17722111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of reduction of life-time risk of cervical cancer through one life-time screening.
    Murthy NS; Agarwal SS; Prabhakar AK; Sharma S; Das DK
    Neoplasma; 1993; 40(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 8272152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical cancer in Croatia: state of the art and possibilities for prevention.
    Znaor A; Strnad M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():37-40. PubMed ID: 17598503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a hospital based cytology screening programme for reduction in life time risk of cervical cancer.
    Agarwal SS; Murthy NS; Sharma S; Sharma KC; Das DK
    Neoplasma; 1995; 42(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 7617084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
    Louhivuori K
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 1782637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK.
    Peto J; Gilham C; Fletcher O; Matthews FE
    Lancet; 2004 Jul 17-23; 364(9430):249-56. PubMed ID: 15262102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer in New Zealand: national and regional trends.
    Cox B; Borman B
    N Z Med J; 1994 Aug; 107(984):323-6. PubMed ID: 8072727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
    Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiology of cervical cancer in Taiwan.
    Wang PD; Lin RS
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 8812531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in invasive cervical cancer incidence in East Anglia from 1971 to 1993.
    Gibson L; Spiegelhalter DJ; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Day NE
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9200063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.