These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18567269)
1. Reduced blocking as a result of increasing the number of blocking cues. Witnauer JE; Urcelay GP; Miller RR Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):651-5. PubMed ID: 18567269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blocking and associability change. Jones PM; Haselgrove M J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jul; 39(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23668185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blocking is not 'pure' cue competition: Renewal-like effects in forward and backward blocking indicate contributions by associative cue interference. Miguez G; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(2):145-159. PubMed ID: 35225640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early Pavlovian conditioning impairs later Pavlovian conditioning. Lariviere NA; Spear NE Dev Psychobiol; 1996 Nov; 29(7):613-35. PubMed ID: 8911775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blocking in Pavlovian conditioning: effect of prior excitatory conditioning to a stimulus extraneous to compound conditioning. DeVito PL; Cashman L; Petka K Psychol Rep; 1994 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1363-81. PubMed ID: 8084957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Miller RR; Matute H J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Dec; 125(4):370-86. PubMed ID: 8945788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Context modulation of US signal value. Goddard MJ; McDowell JL Q J Exp Psychol B; 2001 Aug; 54(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 11547512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When more is less: extending training of the blocking association following compound training attenuates the blocking effect. Pineño O; Urushihara K; Stout S; Fuss J; Miller RR Learn Behav; 2006 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16786881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Degraded contingency revisited: posttraining extinction of a cover stimulus attenuates a target cue's behavioral control. Witnauer JE; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):440-50. PubMed ID: 17924791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential effects of forward or simultaneous conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus intervals on the defensive behavior system of the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus). Esmorís-Arranz FJ; Pardo-Vázquez JL; Vázquez-García GA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 14570520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Augmentation, not blocking, in an A+/AX+ flavor-conditioning procedure. Batson JD; Batsell WR Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 11082852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conditioned stimulus determinants of conditioned response form in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Kim SD; Rivers S; Bevins RA; Ayres JJ J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1996 Jan; 22(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 8568499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevention of the degraded-contingency effect by signalling training trials. Gunther LM; Miller RR Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):97-119. PubMed ID: 10881603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proactive interference between cues trained with a common outcome in first-order Pavlovian conditioning. Amundson JC; Escobar M; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 14570518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]