These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18567272)

  • 1. Object manipulability affects children's and adults' conceptual processing.
    Kalénine S; Bonthoux F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 18567272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: a behavioral and fMRI study.
    Kalénine S; Peyrin C; Pichat C; Segebarth C; Bonthoux F; Baciu M
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18977304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is motor knowledge part and parcel of the concepts of manipulable artifacts? Clues from a case of upper limb aplasia.
    Vannuscorps G; Andres M; Pillon A
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Feb; 84(1):132-40. PubMed ID: 24365637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embodied object concepts: The contribution of structural and functional manipulability depends on available visual information.
    Matheson HE; Salmon JP; Tougas M; McMullen PA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Dec; 72(4):229-243. PubMed ID: 29847975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A functional role for modality-specific perceptual systems in conceptual representations.
    Connell L; Lynott D; Dreyer F
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33321. PubMed ID: 22428020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How action and context priming influence categorization: A developmental study.
    Kalénine S; Bonthoux F; Borghi AM
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2009 Sep; 27(Pt 3):717-30. PubMed ID: 19994577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thematic knowledge, artifact concepts, and the left posterior temporal lobe: Where action and object semantics converge.
    Kalénine S; Buxbaum LJ
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():164-178. PubMed ID: 27389801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.
    Chouinard MM
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2007; 72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. PubMed ID: 17394580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A domain-specific system for representing knowledge of both man-made objects and human actions. Evidence from a case with an association of deficits.
    Vannuscorps G; Pillon A
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2321-41. PubMed ID: 21540045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photographs of manipulable objects are named more quickly than the same objects depicted as line-drawings: Evidence that photographs engage embodiment more than line-drawings.
    Salmon JP; Matheson HE; McMullen PA
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1187. PubMed ID: 25374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.
    Kalénine S; Mirman D; Middleton EL; Buxbaum LJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1274-95. PubMed ID: 22449134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects.
    Magnié MN; Besson M; Poncet M; Dolisi C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):521-60. PubMed ID: 12911106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Boronat CB; Buxbaum LJ; Coslett HB; Tang K; Saffran EM; Kimberg DY; Detre JA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):361-73. PubMed ID: 15820643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERPs Differentially Reflect Automatic and Deliberate Processing of the Functional Manipulability of Objects.
    Madan CR; Chen YY; Singhal A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():360. PubMed ID: 27536224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorization by schema relations and perceptual similarity in 5-year-olds and adults: A study in vision and in audition.
    Berger C; Donnadieu S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Apr; 93(4):304-21. PubMed ID: 16330042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of childhood hearing loss on organization of semantic memory: typicality and relatedness.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Dougherty M; Mehta J; Spence M
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):686-702. PubMed ID: 17086079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knowledge, expectations, and inductive reasoning within conceptual hierarchies.
    Coley JD; Hayes B; Lawson C; Moloney M
    Cognition; 2004 Jan; 90(3):217-53. PubMed ID: 14667696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning.
    Fernandino L; Humphries CJ; Conant LL; Seidenberg MS; Binder JR
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9763-9. PubMed ID: 27656016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptual information on objects' locations.
    Borghi AM; Caramelli N; Setti A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15781302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repetition blindness reveals differences between the representations of manipulable and nonmanipulable objects.
    Harris IM; Murray AM; Hayward WG; O'Callaghan C; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1228-41. PubMed ID: 22708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.