These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18568351)
1. Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs. Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Heisel C; Kretzer JP; Thomsen MN Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Jun; 129(6):849-55. PubMed ID: 18568351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of age, bone quality and body mass index on periprosthetic femoral fractures: a biomechanical laboratory study. Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Kretzer JP; Heisel C; Kleinhans JA; Thomsen M Med Sci Monit; 2009 Nov; 15(11):BR307-12. PubMed ID: 19865047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study. Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there an increased stem migration or compromised osteointegration of the Mayo short-stemmed prosthesis following cerclage wiring of an intrasurgical periprosthetic fracture? Zeh A; Radetzki F; Diers V; Bach D; Röllinghoff M; Delank KS Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Dec; 131(12):1717-22. PubMed ID: 21713540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Changes of periprosthetic bone mineral density in cementless bicontact stem implantation; influence of different parameters--a prospective 4-year follow-up]. Reiter A; Gellrich JC; Bachmann J; Braun A Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12822075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions. Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Lindahl H Injury; 2007 Jun; 38(6):651-4. PubMed ID: 17477925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. Cross M; Bostrom M Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Load transfer and periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthoplasty: Comparison of periprosthetic fractures of femora implanted with cementless distal-load or proximal-load femoral components and measurement of the femoral strain at the time of implantation. Schwarz E; Reinisch G; Brandauer A; Aharinejad S; Scharf W; Trieb K Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2018 May; 54():137-142. PubMed ID: 29587147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A plasma-sprayed titanium proximal coating reduces the risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty. Miles B; Walter WL; Kolos E; Waters T; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Donohoo S; Ruys AJ Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 26407113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip]. Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [ Improvement of femoral bone-cement adhesion in cemented revision hip arthroplasty by application of an amphiphilic bonder in a dynamic femur expulsion testing in vitro ]. Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Marx R; Mumme T Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Dec; 52(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 18047404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study. Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of post-operative periprosthetic femur fracture around total hip arthroplasty: a review. Wu ES; Cherian JJ; Kapadia BH; Banerjee S; Jauregui JJ; Mont MA Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 Jan; 12(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25209073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Young age and wedge stem design are risk factors for periprosthetic fracture after arthroplasty due to hip fracture. A case-control study. Sarvilinna R; Huhtala H; Pajamäki J Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 15788308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation for mechanisms of periprosthetic femoral fractures. Rupprecht M; Sellenschloh K; Grossterlinden L; Püschel K; Morlock M; Amling M; Rueger JM; Lehmann W J Trauma; 2011 Apr; 70(4):E62-6. PubMed ID: 21613972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fatigue fractures of Thompson prostheses. A clinical and biomechanical study of revision procedures. Wood M; Timbs A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Mar; (163):127-33. PubMed ID: 7067242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Franklin J; Malchau H Injury; 2007 Jun; 38(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 17467710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by effective lengthening of the prosthesis. Meyer C; Alt V; Schroeder L; Heiss C; Schnettler R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():120-7. PubMed ID: 17632420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]