658 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18568564)
1. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between ovarian fibroma and subserous uterine leiomyoma.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Daraï E; Nassar-Slaba J; Cortez A; Marsault C; Bazot M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 17414760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Preoperative differential diagnosis of cystic adnexal tumors: double-contrast MRT].
Reuter M; Steffens JC; Schüppler U; Muhle C; Brinkmann G; Kohl A; Weisner D; Lüttges J; Spielmann RP; Heller M
Rofo; 1996 May; 164(5):394-400. PubMed ID: 8634400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors performed by pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging and correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings.
Pilleul F; Rochette A; Partensky C; Scoazec JY; Bernard P; Valette PJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15723374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.
Fujii S; Kakite S; Nishihara K; Kanasaki Y; Harada T; Kigawa J; Kaminou T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1149-56. PubMed ID: 18972356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and malignant adrenal masses.
Inan N; Arslan A; Akansel G; Anik Y; Balci NC; Demirci A
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17466481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic diagnosis of adnexal cystic masses: a 12-year experience with long-term follow-up.
Canis M; Mage G; Pouly JL; Wattiez A; Manhes H; Bruhat MA
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 83(5 Pt 1):707-12. PubMed ID: 8164928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of adnexal masses.
Rajkotia K; Veeramani M; Macura KJ
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 17(6):379-97. PubMed ID: 17417086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in severe pelvic endometriosis.
Dumontier I; Roseau G; Vincent B; Chapron C; Dousset B; Chaussade S; Moreau JF; Dubuisson JB; Couturier D
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1197-204. PubMed ID: 11173733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
Cheung HS; Tse GM; Lai SY; Yeung DK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of ovarian hemorrhage.
Nishino M; Hayakawa K; Iwasaku K; Togashi K; Ueda H; Sago T; Noguchi M
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 51(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15186882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging.
Sohaib SA; Sahdev A; Van Trappen P; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 May; 180(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 12704041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of adnexal masses.
Leng JH; Lang JH; Zhang JJ; Feng FZ; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Zhu L; Zhao XY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Feb; 119(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 16537005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of benign from malignant adnexal masses by functional 3 tesla MRI techniques: diffusion-weighted imaging and time-intensity curves of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Malek M; Pourashraf M; Mousavi AS; Rahmani M; Ahmadinejad N; Alipour A; Hashemi FS; Shakiba M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(8):3407-12. PubMed ID: 25921153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Adusumilli S; Hussain HK; Caoili EM; Weadock WJ; Murray JP; Johnson TD; Chen Q; Desjardins B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 16928938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]