186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18568699)
1. End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods.
Burnier M; Gasser UE
Blood Press; 2008; 17(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18568699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of automated blood pressure measurements in clinical trials and registration studies: data from the VALTOP Study.
Mengden T; Asmar R; Kandra A; Di Giovanni R; Brudi P; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Aug; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 20543666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [How reliable is conventional blood pressure registration? Comparison with a semi-automatic device].
Kolb C; Huss R; Mengden T; Vetter W
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1991 Mar; 80(12):286-90. PubMed ID: 2028135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of end-digit preference in blood pressure records of hospitalized chinese patients and analysis of risk factors.
Jie G; Jian W; Qiaowen H; Shanzhu Z
Postgrad Med; 2012 Mar; 124(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 22437215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ESCAPE-ancillary blood pressure measurement study: end-digit preference in blood pressure measurement within a cluster-randomized trial.
Lebeau JP; Pouchain D; Huas D; Wilmart F; Dibao-Dina C; Boutitie F
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Apr; 16(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 21358538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Green study: quality of blood pressure measurement by general practitioners].
Labaki G; Grès CS; Darné B; Bassous M; Asmar R
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2002; 95(7-8):713-7. PubMed ID: 12365085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ
Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of an automatic sphygmomanometer].
Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
Sb Lek; 1989 Sep; 91(8):274-84. PubMed ID: 2617128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic.
Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM
Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Audit of the treatment of arterial hypertension in specialized consultation].
Tache A; Chatellier G; Azizi M; Sever P; Ménard J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1999 Aug; 92(8):1047-51. PubMed ID: 10486663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
