BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

976 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18568764)

  • 1. Clinical trials of novel and targeted therapies: endpoints, trial design, and analysis.
    Suman VJ; Dueck A; Sargent DJ
    Cancer Invest; 2008 Jun; 26(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 18568764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating novel treatment strategies into conventional therapy.
    Estey EH
    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 7(6):4-7. PubMed ID: 19645129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies].
    Penel N; Saleron J; Lansiaux A; Clisant S; Adenis A; Fournier C; Duhamel A; Bonneterre J
    Bull Cancer; 2008 Feb; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 18304903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New paradigm in dose-finding trials: patient-specific dosing and beyond phase I.
    Rogatko A; Babb JS; Tighiouart M; Khuri FR; Hudes G
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Aug; 11(15):5342-6. PubMed ID: 16061846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining heterogeneity in phase II trial designs may improve success in phase III.
    Tuma RS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Feb; 100(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 18230788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise?
    Rubinstein LV; Dancey JE; Korn EL; Smith MA; Wright JJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1422-3. PubMed ID: 17895470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re: Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Di Maio M; Daniele B; Gallo C; Perrone F
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Nov; 100(21):1557; author reply 1557-8. PubMed ID: 18957679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accelerated approval seen as triumph and roadblock for cancer drugs.
    Susman E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1495-6. PubMed ID: 15494596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.
    El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controversy trails adaptive clinical trials.
    Goozner M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Sep; 104(18):1347-8. PubMed ID: 22984199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epothilone D (Kosan/Roche).
    Kolman A
    Curr Opin Investig Drugs; 2004 Jun; 5(6):657-67. PubMed ID: 15242255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Newer phase II trial designs gaining ground.
    Benowitz S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1428-9. PubMed ID: 17895467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SOP 09: Statistical design and analysis.
    Onkologie; 2003 Oct; 26 Suppl 6():43-7. PubMed ID: 23570186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive design may hasten clinical trials.
    Schmidt C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jan; 99(2):108-9. PubMed ID: 17227993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trial design for evaluation of novel targeted therapies.
    Farley J; Rose PG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19853899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oncology's first Phase 0 trial.
    Rowan K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jul; 101(14):978-9. PubMed ID: 19584322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A strategic framework for novel drug development in multiple myeloma.
    Anderson KC; Hannah AL; Pazdur R; Farrell AT
    Br J Haematol; 2007 Jul; 138(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 17593022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to ensure clinical trial sensitivity in psychotropic drug development: a case study.
    Videla S; Sust M; Fresquet A; Villoria J
    Clin Ther; 2005 Feb; 27(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 15811489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.