These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

981 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18568764)

  • 1. Clinical trials of novel and targeted therapies: endpoints, trial design, and analysis.
    Suman VJ; Dueck A; Sargent DJ
    Cancer Invest; 2008 Jun; 26(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 18568764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating novel treatment strategies into conventional therapy.
    Estey EH
    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 7(6):4-7. PubMed ID: 19645129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies].
    Penel N; Saleron J; Lansiaux A; Clisant S; Adenis A; Fournier C; Duhamel A; Bonneterre J
    Bull Cancer; 2008 Feb; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 18304903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New paradigm in dose-finding trials: patient-specific dosing and beyond phase I.
    Rogatko A; Babb JS; Tighiouart M; Khuri FR; Hudes G
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Aug; 11(15):5342-6. PubMed ID: 16061846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining heterogeneity in phase II trial designs may improve success in phase III.
    Tuma RS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Feb; 100(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 18230788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise?
    Rubinstein LV; Dancey JE; Korn EL; Smith MA; Wright JJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1422-3. PubMed ID: 17895470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re: Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Di Maio M; Daniele B; Gallo C; Perrone F
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Nov; 100(21):1557; author reply 1557-8. PubMed ID: 18957679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accelerated approval seen as triumph and roadblock for cancer drugs.
    Susman E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1495-6. PubMed ID: 15494596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.
    El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controversy trails adaptive clinical trials.
    Goozner M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Sep; 104(18):1347-8. PubMed ID: 22984199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epothilone D (Kosan/Roche).
    Kolman A
    Curr Opin Investig Drugs; 2004 Jun; 5(6):657-67. PubMed ID: 15242255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Newer phase II trial designs gaining ground.
    Benowitz S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1428-9. PubMed ID: 17895467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SOP 09: Statistical design and analysis.
    Onkologie; 2003 Oct; 26 Suppl 6():43-7. PubMed ID: 23570186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive design may hasten clinical trials.
    Schmidt C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jan; 99(2):108-9. PubMed ID: 17227993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trial design for evaluation of novel targeted therapies.
    Farley J; Rose PG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19853899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oncology's first Phase 0 trial.
    Rowan K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jul; 101(14):978-9. PubMed ID: 19584322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A strategic framework for novel drug development in multiple myeloma.
    Anderson KC; Hannah AL; Pazdur R; Farrell AT
    Br J Haematol; 2007 Jul; 138(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 17593022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to ensure clinical trial sensitivity in psychotropic drug development: a case study.
    Videla S; Sust M; Fresquet A; Villoria J
    Clin Ther; 2005 Feb; 27(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 15811489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.