These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569065)

  • 1. Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey.
    Brett S; Sacranie RR; Thomas GE; Rajkhowa R
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2008 Jun; 11(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 18569065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. UK gamete donors' reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment.
    Frith L; Blyth E; Farrand A
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1675-80. PubMed ID: 17449513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think?
    Kettis-Lindblad A; Ring L; Viberth E; Hansson MG
    Eur J Public Health; 2006 Aug; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 16207726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
    Isaksson S; Sydsjö G; Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Sperm or oocyte donation: the dynamics of making the decision regarding the method and timing of disclosure of information to the sibling].
    Eitan-Schiller Y; Seidman DS
    Harefuah; 2009 Apr; 148(4):251-5, 275. PubMed ID: 19630349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?
    Isaksson S; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Lampic C
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective parents' intentions regarding disclosure following the removal of donor anonymity.
    Crawshaw M
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2008 Jun; 11(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 18569064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation.
    McMahon CA; Saunders DM
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 18053994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public awareness of organ donation.
    Evers S; Farewell VT; Halloran PF
    CMAJ; 1988 Feb; 138(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 3337991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with (un)willingness to be an organ donor: importance of public exposure and knowledge.
    Haustein SV; Sellers MT
    Clin Transplant; 2004 Apr; 18(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 15016135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part I: semen donors.
    Daniels K
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2007 Sep; 10(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 17786647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public survey of financial incentives for kidney donation.
    Kranenburg L; Schram A; Zuidema W; Weimar W; Hilhorst M; Hessing E; Passchier J; Busschbach J
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Mar; 23(3):1039-42. PubMed ID: 18029378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues.
    Kramer W; Schneider J; Schultz N
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Dec; 24(12):3144-9. PubMed ID: 19729378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anonymous sperm donors' attitude towards donation and the release of identifying information.
    Mahieu F; Decleer W; Osmanagaoglu K; Provoost V
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Oct; 36(10):2007-2016. PubMed ID: 31463872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients.
    Greenfeld DA; Klock SC
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun; 81(6):1565-71. PubMed ID: 15193478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of organ donor card holders among public officials of a major German city.
    Heuer M; Hertel S; Wirges U; Philipp T; Gerken G; Paul A; Kaiser GM
    Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(6):2505-8. PubMed ID: 19715962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should the law on anonymity of organ donation be changed? The perception of liver transplant recipients.
    Dobbels F; Van Gelder F; Remans K; Verkinderen A; Peeters J; Pirenne J; Nevens F
    Clin Transplant; 2009; 23(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 19210686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Donor gametes: anonymous or identified?
    Daniels K
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 17085077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.