391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569065)
1. Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey.
Brett S; Sacranie RR; Thomas GE; Rajkhowa R
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2008 Jun; 11(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 18569065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. UK gamete donors' reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment.
Frith L; Blyth E; Farrand A
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1675-80. PubMed ID: 17449513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think?
Kettis-Lindblad A; Ring L; Viberth E; Hansson MG
Eur J Public Health; 2006 Aug; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 16207726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
Isaksson S; Sydsjö G; Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Sperm or oocyte donation: the dynamics of making the decision regarding the method and timing of disclosure of information to the sibling].
Eitan-Schiller Y; Seidman DS
Harefuah; 2009 Apr; 148(4):251-5, 275. PubMed ID: 19630349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?
Isaksson S; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Lampic C
Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective parents' intentions regarding disclosure following the removal of donor anonymity.
Crawshaw M
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2008 Jun; 11(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 18569064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation.
McMahon CA; Saunders DM
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 18053994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public awareness of organ donation.
Evers S; Farewell VT; Halloran PF
CMAJ; 1988 Feb; 138(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 3337991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with (un)willingness to be an organ donor: importance of public exposure and knowledge.
Haustein SV; Sellers MT
Clin Transplant; 2004 Apr; 18(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 15016135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part I: semen donors.
Daniels K
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2007 Sep; 10(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 17786647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public survey of financial incentives for kidney donation.
Kranenburg L; Schram A; Zuidema W; Weimar W; Hilhorst M; Hessing E; Passchier J; Busschbach J
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Mar; 23(3):1039-42. PubMed ID: 18029378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues.
Kramer W; Schneider J; Schultz N
Hum Reprod; 2009 Dec; 24(12):3144-9. PubMed ID: 19729378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anonymous sperm donors' attitude towards donation and the release of identifying information.
Mahieu F; Decleer W; Osmanagaoglu K; Provoost V
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Oct; 36(10):2007-2016. PubMed ID: 31463872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients.
Greenfeld DA; Klock SC
Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun; 81(6):1565-71. PubMed ID: 15193478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of organ donor card holders among public officials of a major German city.
Heuer M; Hertel S; Wirges U; Philipp T; Gerken G; Paul A; Kaiser GM
Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(6):2505-8. PubMed ID: 19715962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should the law on anonymity of organ donation be changed? The perception of liver transplant recipients.
Dobbels F; Van Gelder F; Remans K; Verkinderen A; Peeters J; Pirenne J; Nevens F
Clin Transplant; 2009; 23(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 19210686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Donor gametes: anonymous or identified?
Daniels K
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 17085077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
