325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569106)
21. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
Magnusson L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cochlear implant in Hong Kong Cantonese.
Tang SO; Luk WS; Lau CC; So KW; Wong CM; Yiu ML; Kwok CL
Am J Otol; 1990 Nov; 11(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 2285062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Speech coding strategy based on amplitude and frequency modulation for cochlear implants].
Lin H; Wang W
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 28(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 21604474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy.
Francart T; Osses A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 25697275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Superiority of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral cochlear implantation in tone discrimination in chinese patients.
Au DK; Hui Y; Wei WI
Am J Otolaryngol; 2003; 24(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12579478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a comparative study.
Müller-Deile J; Kiefer J; Wyss J; Nicolai J; Battmer R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2008 Mar; 9(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 18300224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
