These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569106)

  • 61. Lexical tone perception ability of profoundly hearing-impaired children: performance of cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Lee KY; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1079-87. PubMed ID: 20634774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Results with a cochlear implant channel-picking strategy based on "Selected Groups".
    Kals M; Schatzer R; Krenmayr A; Vermeire K; Visser D; Bader P; Neustetter C; Zangerl M; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):63-9. PubMed ID: 19944138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
    Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparing cochlear implant users' speech performance with processor fittings based on conventionally determined T and C levels or on compound action potential thresholds and live-voice speech in a prospective balanced crossover study.
    Willeboer C; Smoorenburg GF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 17086087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Acoustic and perceptual study of Cantonese tones produced by profoundly hearing-impaired adolescents.
    Khouw E; Ciocca V
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 16672793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Across-frequency delays based on the cochlear traveling wave: enhanced speech presentation for cochlear implants.
    Taft DA; Grayden DB; Burkitt AN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):596-606. PubMed ID: 19846368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences.
    Stickney GS; Assmann PF; Chang J; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1069-78. PubMed ID: 17672654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the nucleus-24 and freedom cochlear implants.
    Büchner A; Nogueira W; Edler B; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 18223445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants.
    Laneau J; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 16219993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Wolford RD; Zerbi M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 8263821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.
    Milczynski M; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19354401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.
    Chang YP; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1331-41. PubMed ID: 17197499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A high rate n-of-m speech processing strategy for the first generation Clarion cochlear implant.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Buechner C; Boyle P; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Dec; 48(12):868-75. PubMed ID: 20017683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. An improved speech processing strategy for cochlear implants based on an active nonlinear filterbank model of the biological cochlea.
    Kim KH; Choi SJ; Kim JH; Kim DH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):828-36. PubMed ID: 19272890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 18667945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.