These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569107)

  • 21. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):817-28. PubMed ID: 24975235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test.
    Zekveld AA; George EL; Kramer SE; Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 17538101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN).
    Dawson PW; Hersbach AA; Swanson BA
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 23598772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. STARR: a speech test for evaluation of the effectiveness of auditory prostheses under realistic conditions.
    Boyle PJ; Nunn TB; O'Connor AF; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 23135616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B; Del Rio M; Dauman R; James C; Fraysse B; Vormès E; Frachet B; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 22122354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech audiometry in quiet with the Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children.
    Neumann K; Baumeister N; Baumann U; Sick U; Euler HA; Weissgerber T
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 22208668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determining cochlear implant users' true noise tolerance: use of speech reception threshold in noise testing.
    Poissant SF; Bero EM; Busekroos L; Shao W
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 24518402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech-in-noise perception in high-functioning individuals with autism or Asperger's syndrome.
    Alcántara JI; Weisblatt EJ; Moore BC; Bolton PF
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Sep; 45(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 15257667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. German Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children: a useful speech audiometry tool for hearing-impaired children at kindergarten and school age.
    Weißgerber T; Baumann U; Brand T; Neumann K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(5):227-33. PubMed ID: 23038083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise.
    Bhattacharya A; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1079-89. PubMed ID: 17672655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.