BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569153)

  • 1. Configurational factors in the perception of faces and non-facial objects: an ERP study.
    Ishizu T; Ayabe T; Kojima S
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 118(7):955-66. PubMed ID: 18569153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facing a real person: an event-related potential study.
    Pönkänen LM; Hietanen JK; Peltola MJ; Kauppinen PK; Haapalainen A; Leppänen JM
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):497-501. PubMed ID: 18287955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials.
    Werheid K; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Sep; 76(1-2):100-8. PubMed ID: 17681418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related potential patterns and gender effects underlying facial affect processing in schizophrenia patients.
    Lee SH; Kim EY; Kim S; Bae SM
    Neurosci Res; 2010 Jun; 67(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 20214929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Did you see him in the newspaper?" Electrophysiological correlates of context and valence in face processing.
    Galli G; Feurra M; Viggiano MP
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1119(1):190-202. PubMed ID: 17005161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual load manipulation reveals sensitivity of the face-selective N170 to attention.
    Mohamed TN; Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):782-7. PubMed ID: 19369907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorical perception of anger and disgust facial expression is affected by non-clinical social anxiety: an ERP study.
    Rossignol M; Anselme C; Vermeulen N; Philippot P; Campanella S
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1132(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 17184747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
    Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study.
    Sui J; Zhu Y; Han S
    Neuroreport; 2006 Mar; 17(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 16514370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors.
    Nakashima T; Kaneko K; Goto Y; Abe T; Mitsudo T; Ogata K; Makinouchi A; Tobimatsu S
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Dec; 62(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 18809442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurophysiological responses to face, facial regions and objects in adults with Asperger's syndrome: an ERP investigation.
    O'Connor K; Hamm JP; Kirk IJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Mar; 63(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 17267061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Biol Psychol; 2010 May; 84(2):192-205. PubMed ID: 20109520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the functional architecture of person recognition system with event-related potentials in a within- and cross-domain self-priming of faces.
    Jemel B; Pisani M; Rousselle L; Crommelinck M; Bruyer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2024-40. PubMed ID: 16243050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.
    Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Moratti S; Keil A; Burton AM
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1184():226-33. PubMed ID: 17976538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods.
    Trujillo LT; Peterson MA; Kaszniak AW; Allen JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 15589196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early selection of diagnostic facial information in the human visual cortex.
    Joyce CA; Schyns PG; Gosselin F; Cottrell GW; Rossion B
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):800-13. PubMed ID: 16266735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential neural responses to humans vs. robots: an event-related potential study.
    Hirai M; Hiraki K
    Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1165():105-15. PubMed ID: 17658496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.