613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569471)
1. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix.
Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Aiewsakul P
J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Mar; 80(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9175387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
Lee HY
Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
Ayad IA
East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes.
Parisaei M; Erskine KJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18569470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A
Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
