These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569562)

  • 61. An evaluation of energy expenditure estimation by three activity monitors.
    Ryan J; Gormley J
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 24251746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Estimation of Energy Expenditure during Treadmill Exercise via Thermal Imaging.
    Jensen MM; Poulsen MK; Alldieck T; Larsen RG; Gade R; Moeslund TB; Franch J
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Dec; 48(12):2571-2579. PubMed ID: 27327026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Validation of the Actiheart activity monitor for measurement of activity energy expenditure in children and adolescents with chronic disease.
    Takken T; Stephens S; Balemans A; Tremblay MS; Esliger DW; Schneiderman J; Biggar D; Longmuir P; Wright V; McCrindle B; Hendricks M; Abad A; van der Net J; Beyene J; Feldman BM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2010 Dec; 64(12):1494-500. PubMed ID: 20877392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Accelerometer output and its association with energy expenditure in persons with multiple sclerosis.
    Sandroff BM; Motl RW; Suh Y
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 22773205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Influence of higher-grade walking on metabolic demands in young untrained Japanese women.
    Hasegawa H; Inui F
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 May; 21(2):405-8. PubMed ID: 17530987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Estimation of energy expenditure in a work environment: comparison of accelerometry and oxygen consumption/heart rate regression.
    Bouchard DR; Trudeau F
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):663-70. PubMed ID: 18432444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Walking for health in pregnancy: assessment by indirect calorimetry and accelerometry.
    DiNallo JM; Le Masurier GC; Williams NI; Downs DS
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2008 Mar; 79(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18431948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Energy expenditure estimates of the Caltrac accelerometer for running, race walking, and stepping.
    Swan PD; Byrnes WC; Haymes EM
    Br J Sports Med; 1997 Sep; 31(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 9298560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for predicting the energy cost of children's activities.
    Eston RG; Rowlands AV; Ingledew DK
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1998 Jan; 84(1):362-71. PubMed ID: 9451658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Relationships between oxygen uptake, dynamic body acceleration and heart rate in humans.
    D'silva LA; Cardew A; Qasem L; Wilson RP; Lewis MJ
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2015 Oct; 55(10):1049-57. PubMed ID: 24947810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Determining energy expenditure from treadmill walking using hip-worn inertial sensors: an experimental study.
    Vathsangam H; Emken A; Schroeder ET; Spruijt-Metz D; Sukhatme GS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2804-15. PubMed ID: 21690001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Validation of MET estimates and step measurement using the ActivPAL physical activity logger.
    Harrington DM; Welk GJ; Donnelly AE
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Mar; 29(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 21360402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Evaluation of methods for measuring daily physical activity in terms of energy expenditure].
    Yanagibori R; Aoki K; Suzuki Y; Gunji A
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1991 Jul; 38(7):483-91. PubMed ID: 1747538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Estimation of resistance exercise energy expenditure using triaxial accelerometry.
    Stec MJ; Rawson ES
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1413-22. PubMed ID: 22222328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Validation of the RT3 accelerometer for measuring physical activity of children in simulated free-living conditions.
    Sun DX; Schmidt G; Teo-Koh SM
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2008 May; 20(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 18579899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Validity of the SenseWear® Armband to predict energy expenditure in pregnant women.
    Smith KM; Lanningham-Foster LM; Welk GJ; Campbell CG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Oct; 44(10):2001-8. PubMed ID: 22617395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The energetics of walking on sand and grass at various speeds.
    Davies SE; Mackinnon SN
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):651-60. PubMed ID: 16720526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Construct validity of RT3 accelerometer: a comparison of level-ground and treadmill walking at self-selected speeds.
    Hendrick P; Boyd T; Low O; Takarangi K; Paterson M; Claydon L; Milosavljevic S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 20593329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Utility of the actiheart accelerometer for estimating exercise energy expenditure in female adolescent runners.
    Nichols JF; Aralis H; Merino SG; Barrack MT; Stalker-Fader L; Rauh MJ
    Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab; 2010 Dec; 20(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 21116021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of the RT3 Research Tracker and Tritrac R3D accelerometers.
    DeVoe D; Gotshall R; McArthur T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):510-8. PubMed ID: 14620239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.