These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18569734)

  • 21. Polygraphy and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Lie Detection: A Controlled Blind Comparison Using the Concealed Information Test.
    Langleben DD; Hakun JG; Seelig D; Wang AL; Ruparel K; Bilker WB; Gur RC
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2016 Oct; 77(10):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 26794034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Study design in fMRI: basic principles.
    Amaro E; Barker GJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Apr; 60(3):220-32. PubMed ID: 16427175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Psychopathic traits and deception: functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Fullam RS; McKie S; Dolan MC
    Br J Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 194(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 19252152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Looking for the lie: scientists are using brain imaging and other tools as new kinds of lie detectors. But trickier even than finding the source of deception might be navigating a world without it.
    Henig RM
    N Y Times Mag; 2006 Feb; ():47-53, 76, 80. PubMed ID: 17080568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study.
    Langleben DD; Schroeder L; Maldjian JA; Gur RC; McDonald S; Ragland JD; O'Brien CP; Childress AR
    Neuroimage; 2002 Mar; 15(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 11848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
    Schauer F
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scale-free brain functional networks.
    Eguíluz VM; Chialvo DR; Cecchi GA; Baliki M; Apkarian AV
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Jan; 94(1):018102. PubMed ID: 15698136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Time-resolved analysis of fMRI signal changes using Brain Activation Movies.
    Windischberger C; Cunnington R; Lamm C; Lanzenberger R; Langenberger H; Deecke L; Bauer H; Moser E
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 169(1):222-30. PubMed ID: 18207248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural correlates of spontaneous percept switches in ambiguous stimuli: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Ilg R; Wohlschläger AM; Burazanis S; Wöller A; Nunnemann S; Mühlau M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 28(11):2325-32. PubMed ID: 19046373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A replication study of the neural correlates of deception.
    Kozel FA; Padgett TM; George MS
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):852-6. PubMed ID: 15301611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection of deception about multiple, concealed, mock crime items, based on a spatial-temporal analysis of ERP amplitude and scalp distribution.
    Lui M; Rosenfeld JP
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):721-30. PubMed ID: 18665865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans.
    Spence SA; Farrow TF; Herford AE; Wilkinson ID; Zheng Y; Woodruff PW
    Neuroreport; 2001 Sep; 12(13):2849-53. PubMed ID: 11588589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.
    Wolpe PR; Foster KR; Langleben DD
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):39-49. PubMed ID: 16036700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists.
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7096):918-9. PubMed ID: 16791164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Brain and information: event-related potentials.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 425():1-765. PubMed ID: 6588820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.
    Schauer F
    Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences.
    Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Limitations to the detection of deception: true and false recollections are poorly distinguished using an event-related potential procedure.
    Allen JJ; Mertens R
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):473-90. PubMed ID: 18633842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.