These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Psychopathic traits and deception: functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Fullam RS; McKie S; Dolan MC Br J Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 194(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 19252152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Looking for the lie: scientists are using brain imaging and other tools as new kinds of lie detectors. But trickier even than finding the source of deception might be navigating a world without it. Henig RM N Y Times Mag; 2006 Feb; ():47-53, 76, 80. PubMed ID: 17080568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Langleben DD; Schroeder L; Maldjian JA; Gur RC; McDonald S; Ragland JD; O'Brien CP; Childress AR Neuroimage; 2002 Mar; 15(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 11848716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes. Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test. Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards. Schauer F Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Time-resolved analysis of fMRI signal changes using Brain Activation Movies. Windischberger C; Cunnington R; Lamm C; Lanzenberger R; Langenberger H; Deecke L; Bauer H; Moser E J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 169(1):222-30. PubMed ID: 18207248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neural correlates of spontaneous percept switches in ambiguous stimuli: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Ilg R; Wohlschläger AM; Burazanis S; Wöller A; Nunnemann S; Mühlau M Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 28(11):2325-32. PubMed ID: 19046373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A replication study of the neural correlates of deception. Kozel FA; Padgett TM; George MS Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):852-6. PubMed ID: 15301611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of deception about multiple, concealed, mock crime items, based on a spatial-temporal analysis of ERP amplitude and scalp distribution. Lui M; Rosenfeld JP Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):721-30. PubMed ID: 18665865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Brain and information: event-related potentials. Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 425():1-765. PubMed ID: 6588820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond. Schauer F Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences. Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Limitations to the detection of deception: true and false recollections are poorly distinguished using an event-related potential procedure. Allen JJ; Mertens R Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):473-90. PubMed ID: 18633842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]