270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18570094)
21. A step toward truly protecting human subjects: reviewing the review boards.
Albrecht RR
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 15035952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Undue inducements and reasonable risks: will the dismal science lead to dismal research ethics?
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):29-32. PubMed ID: 16179305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Subject protection and the risk-benefit relationship.
Schonfeld TL; Brown JS; Gordon BG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 16179301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Inclusion of children as research participants.
Ward-Smith P
Urol Nurs; 2008 Aug; 28(4):287-9. PubMed ID: 18771164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research.
Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The welcome reassessment of research ethics: is "undue inducement" suspect?
Brody H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 16179298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Does research ethics rest on a mistake?
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):34-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?
VanderWalde A
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 16179303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. New policy on research with children is part of trend toward including more research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 May; 13(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health.
Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL
IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Why researchers cannot establish equipoise.
Veatch RM
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):55-7. PubMed ID: 16885108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Extend the reach of institutional review boards first, then strengthen their depth.
Spike J
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):11-2. PubMed ID: 19061097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Stealth merger: drug companies and government medical research.
Willman D
Los Angeles Times; 2003 Dec; ():A1, A32-3. PubMed ID: 14971391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Advertising for clinical research.
Miller FG; Schorr AF
IRB; 1999; 21(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12625347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research.
Shamoo AE; Schwartz J
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):3-5. PubMed ID: 19061094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
