BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18570576)

  • 1. Comparative costs of ertapenem and cefotetan as prophylaxis for elective colorectal surgery.
    Wilson SE; Turpin RS; Kumar RN; Itani KM; Jensen EH; Pellissier JM; Abramson MA
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2008 Jun; 9(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 18570576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.
    Itani KM; Wilson SE; Awad SS; Jensen EH; Finn TS; Abramson MA
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(25):2640-51. PubMed ID: 17182989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of body mass index and ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis on surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery.
    Itani KM; Jensen EH; Finn TS; Tomassini JE; Abramson MA
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2008 Apr; 9(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 18426345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures.
    Mahmoud NN; Turpin RS; Yang G; Saunders WB
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2009 Dec; 10(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 19708769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infection after elective colorectal surgery: bacteriological analysis of failures in a randomized trial of cefotetan vs. ertapenem prophylaxis.
    Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Merriam CV; Abramson MA
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2009 Apr; 10(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 19226203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ertapenem prophylaxis of surgical site infections in elective colorectal surgery in China: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.
    Leng XS; Zhao YJ; Qiu HZ; Cao YK; Zhu WH; Shen JF; Paschke A; Dai WM; Caldwell N; Wang J
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2014 Dec; 69(12):3379-86. PubMed ID: 25151205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of pharmacist interventions on rational prophylactic antibiotic use and cost saving in elective cesarean section.
    Wang J; Dong M; Lu Y; Zhao X; Li X; Wen A
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2015 Aug; 53(8):605-15. PubMed ID: 26104036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery.
    Itani KM; Wilson SE; Awad SS; Jensen EH; Finn TS; Abramson MA
    Am J Surg; 2007 Feb; 193(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 17236845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carbapenems for surgical prophylaxis?
    Sexton DJ
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(25):2693-5. PubMed ID: 17182996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pharmacodynamic modelling of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.
    Moine P; Fish DN
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2013 Feb; 41(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 23182539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cefotetan versus conventional triple antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal cancer surgery.
    Jeong WK; Park JW; Lim SB; Choi HS; Jeong SY
    J Korean Med Sci; 2010 Mar; 25(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 20191043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double-blind comparison of single-dose alatrofloxacin and cefotetan as prophylaxis of infection following elective colorectal surgery. Trovafloxacin Surgical Group.
    Milsom JW; Smith DL; Corman ML; Howerton RA; Yellin AE; Luke DR
    Am J Surg; 1998 Dec; 176(6A Suppl):46S-52S. PubMed ID: 9935257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation in elective resectional colorectal surgery reduces rates of surgical site infections: a single-centre experience with a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Vadhwana B; Pouzi A; Surjus Kaneta G; Reid V; Claxton D; Pyne L; Chalmers R; Malik A; Bowers D; Groot-Wassink T
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2020 Feb; 102(2):133-140. PubMed ID: 31508999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antibiotic prophylaxis and incisional surgical site infection following colorectal cancer surgery: an analysis of 330 cases.
    Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat D
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jan; 92(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19260237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections accounting for antibiotic resistance.
    Jansen JP; Kumar R; Carmeli Y
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):234-44. PubMed ID: 20667059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-term versus long-term administration of single prophylactic antibiotic in elective gastric tumor surgery.
    Wang F; Chen XZ; Liu J; Yang K; Zhang B; Chen ZX; Chen JP; Hu JK; Zhou ZG; Mo XM; Mo XM
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 Sep; 59(118):1784-8. PubMed ID: 22282038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Risk of Surgical Site Infections in Open Colectomies.
    Poeran J; Wasserman I; Zubizarreta N; Mazumdar M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Aug; 59(8):733-42. PubMed ID: 27384091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Definitive risk factors for anastomotic leaks in elective open colorectal resection.
    Suding P; Jensen E; Abramson MA; Itani K; Wilson SE
    Arch Surg; 2008 Sep; 143(9):907-11; discussion 911-2. PubMed ID: 18794430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis for intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cancer: a retrospective study comparing ertapenem and nonertapenem antibiotics.
    Mahajan SN; Ariza-Heredia EJ; Rolston KV; Graviss LS; Feig BW; Aloia TA; Chemaly RF
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 21(2):513-9. PubMed ID: 24114052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection of prophylactic antimicrobial agent may affect incidence of infection in small bowel and colorectal surgery.
    Eagye KJ; Nicolau DP
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2011 Dec; 12(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 22142316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.