These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18570993)

  • 41. Degradation of trans-polyisoprene after root filling with thermoplasticized techniques.
    Maniglia-Ferreira C; Bönecker G; Silva JB; de Paula RC; Feitosa JP; Souza-Filho FJ
    Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18217996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of the area of resin-based sealer and voids in roots obturated with Resilon and gutta-percha.
    Gulsahi K; Cehreli ZC; Onay EO; Tasman-Dagli F; Ungor M
    J Endod; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1338-41. PubMed ID: 17963959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Resistance to fracture of roots filled with three different techniques.
    Sagsen B; Er O; Kahraman Y; Akdogan G
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jan; 40(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 17209830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In vitro evaluation of the obturation ability, adaptation and compaction of gutta-percha in the root canal system employing different filling techniques.
    Mazotti D; Sivieri-Araújo G; Berbert FL; Bonetti-Filho I
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2008; 21(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18841739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effectiveness of different gutta-percha techniques when filling experimental internal resorptive cavities.
    Gencoglu N; Yildirim T; Garip Y; Karagenc B; Yilmaz H
    Int Endod J; 2008 Oct; 41(10):836-42. PubMed ID: 18822011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the thermoplasticity of different gutta-percha cones and Resilon.
    Tanomaru-Filho M; Silveira GF; Tanomaru JM; Bier CA
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Apr; 33(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 17461837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of regrowth of Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules after sealing with gutta-percha or Resilon.
    Shin SJ; Jee SW; Song JS; Jung IY; Cha JH; Kim E
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 18358893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of MicroSeal and System B/Obtura II obturation techniques.
    Cathro PR; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 2003 Dec; 36(12):876-82. PubMed ID: 14641428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro analysis of thermocompaction time and gutta-percha type on quality of main canal and lateral canals filling.
    Michelotto AL; Moura-Netto C; Araki AT; Akisue E; Moura AA; Sydney GB
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 20877965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of filling procedures and the partial removal of filling on the seal of root canals filled with gutta-percha and glass ionomer cement.
    Raiden G; Cuezzo V; Gallegos P; Posleman I; Costa L
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2007; 20(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 18590256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of different root canal obturation techniques on bacterial penetration.
    Yücel AC; Ciftçi A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Oct; 102(4):e88-92. PubMed ID: 16997102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of intracanal sealer distribution with 5 different obturation techniques.
    Hugh CL; Walton RE; Facer SR
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Oct; 36(9):721-9. PubMed ID: 16163875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retention of fiber posts cemented at different time intervals in canals obturated using an epoxy resin sealer.
    Vano M; Cury AH; Goracci C; Chieffi N; Gabriele M; Tay FR; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):801-7. PubMed ID: 18621457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials.
    Somma F; Cammarota G; Plotino G; Grande NM; Pameijer CH
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 18358899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Thermoplasticized gutta percha obturation techniques.
    Bhatti SA; Joshi R
    Dent Update; 1997; 24(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 9515346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha.
    Williams C; Loushine RJ; Weller RN; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Endod; 2006 Jun; 32(6):553-5. PubMed ID: 16728249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Horvath SD; Altenburger MJ; Naumann M; Wolkewitz M; Schirrmeister JF
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 19825038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Aydin B; Köse T; Calişkan MK
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1050-6. PubMed ID: 19825041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A laboratory analysis of gutta-percha-filled area obtained using Thermafil, System B and lateral condensation.
    De-Deus G; Gurgel-Filho ED; Magalhães KM; Coutinho-Filho T
    Int Endod J; 2006 May; 39(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 16640636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.