BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18571025)

  • 21. Changes in face topography from supine-to-upright position-And soft tissue correction values for craniofacial identification.
    Munn L; Stephan CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():40-50. PubMed ID: 29852367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of three-dimensional facial morphology between upright and supine positions employing three-dimensional scanner from live subjects.
    Bulut O; Jessica Liu CY; Koca F; Wilkinson C
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2017 Jul; 27():32-37. PubMed ID: 28675828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of sitting, standing, and supine body positions on facial soft tissue: detailed 3D analysis.
    Ozsoy U; Sekerci R; Ogut E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 44(10):1309-16. PubMed ID: 26116065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data.
    Stauber I; Vairaktaris E; Holst A; Schuster M; Hirschfelder U; Neukam FW; Nkenke E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):268-82. PubMed ID: 18797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Technical validation of the Di3D stereophotogrammetry surface imaging system.
    Winder RJ; Darvann TA; McKnight W; Magee JD; Ramsay-Baggs P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 17980940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laser scanning of the ear identifying the shape and position in subjects with normal facial symmetry.
    Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 29(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 10691137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Morphometric analysis of facial profile in adults.
    Krey KF; Dannhauer KH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Nov; 69(6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19169639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gender and age differences in facial expressions.
    Houstis O; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 19541798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia).
    Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Chaitidis D; Berg-Boerner I; Krol Z; Kovacs L; Schwenzer NF; Zimmerer S; Holberg C; Zeilhofer HF
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 36(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 18701312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of a Method for Computing Facial Symmetry Plane and Degree of Asymmetry Based on 3D-data.
    Hartmann J; Meyer-Marcotty P; Benz M; Häusler G; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Nov; 68(6):477-90. PubMed ID: 18034288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three dimensions using stereophotogrammetry.
    Ras F; Habets LL; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 7639437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of gravity upon some facial signs.
    Flament F; Bazin R; Piot B
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2015 Jun; 37(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 25565330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can facial type be used to predict changes in hyoid bone position with age? A perspective based on longitudinal data.
    Pae EK; Quas C; Quas J; Garrett N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):792-7. PubMed ID: 19061806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability of a three-dimensional method for measuring facial animation: a case report.
    Trotman CA; Gross MM; Moffatt K
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 8805914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion.
    Gross MM; Trotman CA; Moffatt KS
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 8805913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The establishment of three-dimensional soft tissue facial reconstruction and morphometry].
    Bai Y; Guo H; Liu F
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 36(4):298-300. PubMed ID: 11718016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The perception of children's computer-imaged facial profiles by patients, mothers and clinicians.
    Miner RM; Anderson NK; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1034-9. PubMed ID: 18004912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Role of Gravity in Periorbital and Midfacial Aging.
    Mally P; Czyz CN; Wulc AE
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Aug; 34(6):809-22. PubMed ID: 24879881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.