261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18571083)
1. DisCoVisc versus the soft-shell technique using Viscoat and Provisc in phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial.
Praveen MR; Koul A; Vasavada AR; Pandita D; Dixit NV; Dahodwala FF
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1145-51. PubMed ID: 18571083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of the soft-shell technique in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.
Tarnawska D; Wylegała E
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1907-12. PubMed ID: 17964396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of the soft-shell technique using Viscoat and Hyal-2000.
Kim H; Joo CK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2366-70. PubMed ID: 15519090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelium during cataract surgery by phacoemulsification.
Adina B
Oftalmologia; 2008; 52(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 18714496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the effect of Viscoat and DuoVisc on postoperative intraocular pressure after small-incision cataract surgery.
Rainer G; Stifter E; Luksch A; Menapace R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 18242449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of high and low aspiration parameters on postoperative outcomes of phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial.
Vasavada AR; Praveen MR; Vasavada VA; Vasavada VA; Raj SM; Asnani PK; Garg VS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):588-93. PubMed ID: 20362850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational study.
Vasavada V; Vasavada V; Raj SM; Vasavada AR
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17531697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retained Viscoat and intraocular pressure after phaceomulsification.
Watts P; Austin M
Indian J Ophthalmol; 1999 Dec; 47(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 10892480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of ophthalmic viscosurgical device retention using in vivo confocal microscopy.
Petroll WM; Jafari M; Lane SS; Jester JV; Cavanagh HD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Dec; 31(12):2363-8. PubMed ID: 16473232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a new cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device on corneal protection and intraocular pressure in small-incision cataract surgery.
Neumayer T; Prinz A; Findl O
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1362-6. PubMed ID: 18655988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparison of Healon5 and Healon in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation; Randomized multicenter study.
Oshika T; Eguchi S; Oki K; Yaguchi S; Bissen-Miyajima H; Ota I; Sugita G; Miyata K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 15030824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular pressure after cataract surgery using Provasc, Viscoat either separately or in combination.
Chiseliţă D; Danielescu C; Gherghel D
Oftalmologia; 2008; 52(3):91-7. PubMed ID: 19149126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effect of Healon vs. Viscoat on endothelial cell count after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber lens implantation.
Cosemans I; Zeyen P; Zeyen T
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1999; 274():87-92. PubMed ID: 10670165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelial cell population during cataract surgery: a prospective study of cohesive and dispersive viscoelastics.
Storr-Paulsen A; Nørregaard JC; Farik G; Tårnhøj J
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Mar; 85(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 17305732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: Microincision versus standard technique.
Mencucci R; Ponchietti C; Virgili G; Giansanti F; Menchini U
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 16863974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in phacoemulsification [ISRCTN34957881].
Vajpayee RB; Verma K; Sinha R; Titiyal JS; Pandey RM; Sharma N
BMC Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 5():17. PubMed ID: 16018819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of viscoelasticity on corneal endothelial cell loss in phacoemulsification].
Dekaris I; Gabrić N; Spoljarić N; Lazić R; Bosnar ID
Acta Med Croatica; 2002; 56(4-5):157-61. PubMed ID: 12768894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.
Liu Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Yuan Z; Xia Y; Zeng Y
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17276271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal times for a dispersive and a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device correlated with intraocular lens material.
Auffarth GU; Holzer MP; Visessook N; Apple DJ; Völcker HE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2410-4. PubMed ID: 15519097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention and removal of a new viscous dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device during cataract surgery in animal eyes.
Oshika T; Okamoto F; Kaji Y; Hiraoka T; Kiuchi T; Sato M; Kawana K
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 16547332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
