These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18571916)

  • 1. A framework of analysis for field experiments with alternative materials in road construction.
    François D; Jullien A
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):374-82. PubMed ID: 18571916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Full-scale experimentations on alternative materials in roads: analysis of study practices.
    François D; Jullien A; Kerzreho JP; Chateau L
    Waste Manag; 2009 Mar; 29(3):1076-83. PubMed ID: 18835705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction demolition wastes, Waelz slag and MSWI bottom ash: a comparative technical analysis as material for road construction.
    Vegas I; Ibañez JA; San José JT; Urzelai A
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 17451930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental evaluation of reuse of by-products as road construction materials in Sweden.
    Roth L; Eklund M
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 12623085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental acceptability of beneficial use of waste as construction material--state of knowledge, current practices and future developments in Europe and in France.
    Chateau L
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jan; 139(3):556-62. PubMed ID: 16600485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.
    Roussat N; Dujet C; Méhu J
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 18572397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geochemical anomalies from bottom ash in a road construction--comparison of the leaching potential between an ash road and the surroundings.
    Lind BB; Norrman J; Larsson LB; Ohlsson SA; Bristav H
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 17306524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monotonic aspects of the mechanical behaviour of bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration and its potential use for road construction.
    Becquart F; Bernard F; Abriak NE; Zentar R
    Waste Manag; 2009 Apr; 29(4):1320-9. PubMed ID: 18977129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sustainable construction: composite use of tyres and ash in concrete.
    Snelson DG; Kinuthia JM; Davies PA; Chang SR
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):360-7. PubMed ID: 18799299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems.
    Rigamonti L; Grosso M; Giugliano M
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):934-44. PubMed ID: 18684610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating construction and demolition debris generation using a materials flow analysis approach.
    Cochran KM; Townsend TG
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2247-54. PubMed ID: 20472418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leaching assessment of road materials containing primary lead and zinc slags.
    Barna R; Moszkowicz P; Gervais C
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(9):945-55. PubMed ID: 15504672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Life-cycle impacts of the use of industrial by-products in road and earth construction.
    Mroueh UM; Eskola P; Laine-Ylijoki J
    Waste Manag; 2001; 21(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 11280519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong.
    Jaillon L; Poon CS; Chiang YH
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):309-20. PubMed ID: 18434128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Closed cycle construction: an integrated process for the separation and reuse of C&D waste.
    Mulder E; de Jong TP; Feenstra L
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(10):1408-15. PubMed ID: 17532617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matt waste from glass separated collection: an eco-sustainable addition for new building materials.
    Bignozzi MC; Saccani A; Sandrolini F
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):329-34. PubMed ID: 18472414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of industrial by-products in controlled low-strength materials (CLSM).
    Nataraja MC; Nalanda Y
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(7):1168-81. PubMed ID: 17582753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of inert C&D materials for seawall foundation: quality control measures.
    Yeung AT; Tham LG; Lee PK; Mok KY; Pei G
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(6):768-77. PubMed ID: 16750907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Framework for estimating potential wastes and secondary resources accumulated within an economy--a case study of construction minerals in Japan.
    Hashimoto S; Tanikawa H; Moriguchi Y
    Waste Manag; 2009 Nov; 29(11):2859-66. PubMed ID: 19608398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value added eco-friendly products from tannery solid wastes.
    Sastry TP; Sehgal RK; Ramasami T
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2005 Oct; 47(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 17051910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.