BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1857311)

  • 1. Cervical cancer screening: a comparison of recruitment strategies among older women.
    Mitchell H; Hirst S; Cockburn J; Reading DJ; Staples MP; Medley G
    Med J Aust; 1991 Jul; 155(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
    Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
    Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
    Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
    Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
    Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
    Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing cervical screening in women of more than 40 years of age: an intervention in general practice.
    Cockburn J; Hirst S; Hill D; Marks R
    Med J Aust; 1990 Feb; 152(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 2300026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pap smear screening at an urban aboriginal health service: report of a practice audit and an evaluation of recruitment strategies.
    Hunt JM; Gless GL; Straton JA
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1998 Oct; 22(6):720-5. PubMed ID: 9848971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
    Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of a campaign to increase cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria.
    Hirst S; Mitchell H; Medley G
    Community Health Stud; 1990; 14(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 2253461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of three community based strategies to promote screening for cervical cancer.
    Byles JE; Sanson-Fisher RW; Redman S; Dickinson JA; Halpin S
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):150-8. PubMed ID: 8790508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Call and recall for cervical cancer screening in a developing country: a randomised field trial.
    Torres-Mejía G; Salmerón-Castro J; Téllez-Rojo MM; Lazcano-Ponce EC; Juárez-Márquez SA; Torres-Torija I; Gil-Abadíe L; Buiatti E
    Int J Cancer; 2000 Sep; 87(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 10956399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Buehler SK; Parsons WL
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.
    Racey CS; Gesink DC; Burchell AN; Trivers S; Wong T; Rebbapragada A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 26598955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical cancer screening in Western Australia in 1992: progress since 1983.
    Straton JA; Holman CD; Edwards BM
    Med J Aust; 1993 Nov; 159(10):657-61. PubMed ID: 8232008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under-screened women in NSW?
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Zeckendorf S; Niciak A; Wain G; Ross J
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 29(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 15782877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1.
    Lea CS; Perez-Heydrich C; Des Marais AC; Richman AR; Barclay L; Brewer NT; Smith JS
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Aug; 28(8):1094-1104. PubMed ID: 30874477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies.
    Marcus AC; Crane LA; Kaplan CP; Reading AE; Savage E; Gunning J; Bernstein G; Berek JS
    Med Care; 1992 Mar; 30(3):216-30. PubMed ID: 1538610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sociodemographic factors of Pap smear screening in Taiwan.
    Wang PD; Lin RS
    Public Health; 1996 Mar; 110(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8901257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomised controlled trial of strategies to prompt attendance for a Pap smear.
    Bowman J; Sanson-Fisher R; Boyle C; Pope S; Redman S
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 8719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.