18 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1857311)
1. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
Staley H; Shiraz A; Shreeve N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Gajjar K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Sep; 9(9):CD002834. PubMed ID: 34694000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.
Camilloni L; Ferroni E; Cendales BJ; Pezzarossi A; Furnari G; Borgia P; Guasticchi G; Giorgi Rossi P;
BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():464. PubMed ID: 23663511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
Everett T; Bryant A; Griffin MF; Martin-Hirsch PP; Forbes CA; Jepson RG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 May; 2011(5):CD002834. PubMed ID: 21563135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Buehler SK; Parsons WL
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer screening: a comparison of recruitment strategies among older women.
Mitchell H; Hirst S; Cockburn J; Reading DJ; Staples MP; Medley G
Med J Aust; 1991 Jul; 155(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
