These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573123)
1. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial. Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic and clinical evaluation for maxillary sinus augmentation using macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate in human. Lee JH; Jung UW; Kim CS; Choi SH; Cho KS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):767-71. PubMed ID: 18705808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Tawil G; Mawla M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report. Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study. Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study of implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal and moderate residual crestal bone: results after 1 to 5 years. Urban IA; Lozada JL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1203-12. PubMed ID: 21197499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations. de Vicente JC; Hernández-Vallejo G; Braña-Abascal P; Peña I Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):430-8. PubMed ID: 20443796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients. Hallman M; Nordin T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15101593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sinus grafting with a natural fluorohydroxyapatite for immediate load: a study with histologic analysis and histomorphometry. Lee CY; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS; Stover JD; Suzuki JB J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):164-75. PubMed ID: 19813420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study. Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are culture-expanded autogenous bone cells a clinically reliable option for sinus grafting? Fuerst G; Strbac GD; Vasak C; Tangl S; Leber J; Gahleitner A; Gruber R; Watzek G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19077153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study. Bystedt H; Rasmusson L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases. Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ridge augmentation and maxillary sinus grafting with a biphasic calcium phosphate: histologic and histomorphometric observations. Friedmann A; Dard M; Kleber BM; Bernimoulin JP; Bosshardt DD Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 19453566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients. Urban IA; Nagursky H; Lozada JL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):404-14. PubMed ID: 21483894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the value of anorganic bone additives in sinus floor augmentation: a review of clinical reports. Merkx MA; Maltha JC; Stoelinga PJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12653225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]