BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573124)

  • 1. Estimation of the number of SNP genetic markers required for parentage verification.
    Baruch E; Weller JI
    Anim Genet; 2008 Oct; 39(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 18573124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for pig identification and parentage exclusion.
    Rohrer GA; Freking BA; Nonneman D
    Anim Genet; 2007 Jun; 38(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 17433014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of SNP markers for individual identification and parentage test in a Japanese black cattle population.
    Hara K; Watabe H; Sasazaki S; Mukai F; Mannen H
    Anim Sci J; 2010 Apr; 81(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 20438494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The number of single nucleotide polymorphisms and on-farm data required for whole-herd parentage testing in dairy cattle herds.
    Fisher PJ; Malthus B; Walker MC; Corbett G; Spelman RJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):369-74. PubMed ID: 19109294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing parent numbers from offspring genotypes: the importance of marker polymorphism.
    Sefc KM; Koblmüller S
    J Hered; 2009; 100(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 18984859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of the number of genetic markers required for individual animal identification accounting for genotyping errors.
    Weller JI; Seroussi E; Ron M
    Anim Genet; 2006 Aug; 37(4):387-9. PubMed ID: 16879353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the ability of tree-based methods and logistic regression for the detection of SNP-SNP interaction.
    García-Magariños M; López-de-Ullibarri I; Cao R; Salas A
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 May; 73(Pt 3):360-9. PubMed ID: 19291098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing exclusionary power of a paternity test involving a pair of alleged grandparents.
    Scarpetta MA; Staub RW; Einum DD
    Transfusion; 2007 Feb; 47(2):335-40. PubMed ID: 17302781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a 25-plex SNP assay for traceability in cattle.
    Karniol B; Shirak A; Baruch E; Singrün C; Tal A; Cahana A; Kam M; Skalski Y; Brem G; Weller JI; Ron M; Seroussi E
    Anim Genet; 2009 Jun; 40(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 19292709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preserving population allele frequencies in ex situ conservation programs.
    Saura M; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández J; Toro MA; Caballero A
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1277-87. PubMed ID: 18680505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The expected performance of single nucleotide polymorphism loci in paternity testing.
    Ayres KL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(2-3):167-72. PubMed ID: 16182962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parentage identification using single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes: application to product tracing.
    Hill WG; Salisbury BA; Webb AJ
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2508-17. PubMed ID: 18502887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
    Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
    Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On marker-based parentage verification via non-linear optimization.
    Boerner V
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):50. PubMed ID: 28619083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microarray of SNPs for diverse applications in commercial pig breeding.
    Kamińiski S; Brym P; Help H; Ruść A; Wójcik E
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2009; 12(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 19459442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.
    Jamieson A; Taylor SC
    Anim Genet; 1997 Dec; 28(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 9616104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
    Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study on genetic polymorphisms of 13 SNP loci in Guangxi Zhuang population of China].
    Wang RH; Yu WJ; Liu LM; Zhao JL
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 26(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 19350522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of parentage testing using single nucleotide polymorphism markers for draft horses in Japan.
    Ishige T; Kikuchi M; Kakoi H; Hirota KI; Ohnuma A; Tozaki T; Hirosawa Y; Tanaka S; Nagata SI
    Anim Sci J; 2023; 94(1):e13854. PubMed ID: 37427667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.