BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573226)

  • 1. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18649491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary testing for normality: some statistical aspects of a common concept.
    Schoder V; Himmelmann A; Wilhelm KP
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 31(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 17040259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.
    Kuijpers RE; van der Ark LA; Croon MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 23663052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
    Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on using stratified alpha to estimate the composite reliability of a test composed of interrelated nonhomogeneous items.
    Rae G
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17563171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size for the exact conditional test under inverse sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 8731008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.
    Gwet KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the regression slopes of independent groups.
    Ng M; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):319-40. PubMed ID: 19807946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved statistics for contrasting means of two samples under non-normality.
    Xu J; Cui X; Gupta AK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):21-40. PubMed ID: 17908368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
    Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.
    Hunsley J; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 14692841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis.
    Slaney KL; Maraun MD
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):376-90. PubMed ID: 19072000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.