424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573590)
21. Efficacy and safety of the EZ-IO™ intraosseous device: Out-of-hospital implementation of a management algorithm for difficult vascular access.
Gazin N; Auger H; Jabre P; Jaulin C; Lecarpentier E; Bertrand C; Margenet A; Combes X
Resuscitation; 2011 Jan; 82(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 20947238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service.
Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V
J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Two Intraosseous Devices: The NIO Versus the EZ-IO by Novice Users-A Randomized Cross Over Trial.
Shina A; Baruch EN; Shlaifer A; Shovali A; Levi M; Yosefy O; Segal D; Bader T; Shavit I; Yitzhak A
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2017; 21(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 27870553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of two intraosseous devices in adult patients in the emergency setting: a pilot study.
Demir OF; Aydin K; Akay H; Erbil B; Karcioglu O; Gulalp B
Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 23(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 25075979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intraosseous infusion of blood products and epinephrine in an adult patient in hemorrhagic shock.
Burgert JM
AANA J; 2009 Oct; 77(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19911645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Feasibility of basic emergency medical technicians to perform selected advanced life support interventions.
Guyette FX; Rittenberger JC; Platt T; Suffoletto B; Hostler D; Wang HE
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2006; 10(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 16997785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Semi-elective intraosseous infusion after failed intravenous access in pediatric anesthesia.
Neuhaus D; Weiss M; Engelhardt T; Henze G; Giest J; Strauss J; Eich C
Paediatr Anaesth; 2010 Feb; 20(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 20078814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intraosseous drug administration in children and adults during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Buck ML; Wiggins BS; Sesler JM
Ann Pharmacother; 2007 Oct; 41(10):1679-86. PubMed ID: 17698894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Feasibility of sternal intraosseous access by emergency medical technician students.
Miller DD; Guimond G; Hostler DP; Platt T; Wang HE
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2005; 9(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 16036832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of two different intraosseous access methods in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service - a quality assurance study.
Sørgjerd R; Sunde GA; Heltne JK
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 27(1):15. PubMed ID: 30760297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Anatomical investigations on intraosseous access in stillborns - Comparison of different devices and techniques.
Fuchs Z; Scaal M; Haverkamp H; Koerber F; Persigehl T; Eifinger F
Resuscitation; 2018 Jun; 127():79-82. PubMed ID: 29627398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dermal Abrasion Experienced as an Adverse Effect of the EZ-IO(®).
Overbey JK; Kon AA
J Emerg Med; 2016 Jan; 50(1):e7-10. PubMed ID: 26603361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation.
Szarpak L; Truszewski Z; Smereka J; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Adamczyk P; Czyzewski L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3724. PubMed ID: 27196493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of the EZ-IO needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access--a preliminary, observational, multicenter study.
Schalk R; Schweigkofler U; Lotz G; Zacharowski K; Latasch L; Byhahn C
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 19():65. PubMed ID: 22029625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Observational review of paediatric intraosseous needle placement in the paediatric emergency department.
Pifko EL; Price A; Busch C; Smith C; Jiang Y; Dobson J; Tuuri R
J Paediatr Child Health; 2018 May; 54(5):546-550. PubMed ID: 29125229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraosseous infusion rates under high pressure: a cadaveric comparison of anatomic sites.
Pasley J; Miller CH; DuBose JJ; Shackelford SA; Fang R; Boswell K; Halcome C; Casey J; Cotter M; Matsuura M; Relph N; Tarmey NT; Stein DM
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Feb; 78(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 25757113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An observational, prospective study comparing tibial and humeral intraosseous access using the EZ-IO.
Ong MEH; Chan YH; Oh JJ; Ngo AS
Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jan; 27(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19041528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial.
Drozd A; Smereka J; Pruc M; Malysz M; Gasecka A; Sonmez LO; Cyran M; Konge L; Szarpak L
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 49():189-194. PubMed ID: 34126564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Preclinical use of intraosseous access (IO) in adults: literature review and case reports].
Toursarkissian M; Schmidbauer W; Breckwoldt J; Spies C
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2009 Jan; 44(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 19115184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Powered intraosseous access in the prehospital setting: MCHD EMS puts the EZ-IO to the test.
Gillum L; Kovar J
JEMS; 2005 Oct; 30(10):suppl 24-5. PubMed ID: 16382515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
