BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573767)

  • 1. Pay for performance in Australia: Queensland's new Clinical Practice Improvement Payment.
    Duckett S; Daniels S; Kamp M; Stockwell A; Walker G; Ward M
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Jul; 13(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 18573767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective payment to encourage system wide quality improvement.
    McNair P; Borovnicar D; Jackson T; Gillett S
    Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19194336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The early experience of a hospital-based pay-for-performance program.
    Sautter KM; Bokhour BG; White B; Young GJ; Burgess JF; Berlowitz D; Wheeler JR
    J Healthc Manag; 2007; 52(2):95-107; discussion 107-8. PubMed ID: 17447537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The implications of "pay-for-performance" reimbursement for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
    Cognetti DM; Reiter D
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Jun; 134(6):1036-42. PubMed ID: 16730552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinvigorating the quality improvement incentives of hospital prospective payment.
    Iezzoni LI
    Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 19194335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pay for performance: will your hospital be ready?
    O'Hare PK
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2005 May; 59(5):46-8. PubMed ID: 15938348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pay for performance schemes in primary care: what have we learnt?
    Peckham S; Wallace A
    Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 20529472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Climbing up the pay-for-performance learning curve: where are the early adopters now?
    Rosenthal MB; Landon BE; Howitt K; Song HR; Epstein AM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(6):1674-82. PubMed ID: 17978386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data quality bias: an underrecognized source of misclassification in pay-for-performance reporting?
    Terris DD; Litaker DG
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18204374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician-level P4P--DOA? Can quality-based payment be resuscitated?
    McMahon LF; Hofer TP; Hayward RA
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 May; 13(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 17488186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality improvement in New Zealand healthcare. Part 5: measurement for monitoring and controlling performance--the quest for external accountability.
    Perkins R; Seddon M;
    N Z Med J; 2006 Sep; 119(1241):U2149. PubMed ID: 16964301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innovative health reform models: pay-for-performance initiatives.
    Glickman SW; Peterson ED
    Am J Manag Care; 2009 Dec; 15(10 Suppl):S300-5. PubMed ID: 20088634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital innovativeness and organizational performance: evidence from English public acute care.
    Salge TO; Vera A
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2009; 34(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 19104264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quest for quality: perspectives from the safety net.
    Anderson RJ; Amarasingham R; Pickens SS
    Front Health Serv Manage; 2007; 23(4):15-28. PubMed ID: 17621924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.
    Werner RM; Kolstad JT; Stuart EA; Polsky D
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Apr; 30(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 21471490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing a national strategy for patient safety: lessons from the National Health Service in England.
    Lewis RQ; Fletcher M
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Apr; 14(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 15805460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making the 'pay' matter in pay-for-performance: implications for payment strategies.
    Werner RM; Dudley RA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2009; 28(5):1498-508. PubMed ID: 19738269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pay for performance in hospitals: implications for nurses and nursing care.
    Bodrock JA; Mion LC
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 18425024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Industry influence in the creation of pay-for-performance quality measures.
    Rose J
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 18204375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.