These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573767)
61. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation]. Giraldes Mdo R Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Implementation of a severity-adjusted diagnosis-related groups payment system in a large health plan: implications for pay for performance. Fay MD; Jackson DA; Vogel BB J Ambul Care Manage; 2007; 30(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 17581433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Data integrity: the quest for meaningful, usable data is accelerating as a P4P surge sweeps healthcare. Hagland M Healthc Inform; 2009 Feb; 25(14):38-9, 41. PubMed ID: 19266853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Pay-for-performance: considerations in application to the management of spinal disorders. Berven S; Smith A; Bozic K; Bradford DS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11 Suppl):S33-8. PubMed ID: 17495584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Clinical performance measurement in surgery and orthopedics -- new aspects in 2004]. Döbler K; Mohr VD Zentralbl Chir; 2004 Jun; 129(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 15237319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. [Employment of WHO criteria for the assessment of provider payment systems in diagnosis related groups]. Leister JE; Stausberg J Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(9):567-71. PubMed ID: 16398198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Employing clinical decision support to attain our strategic goal: the safe care of the surgical patient. Magid SK; Pancoast PE; Fields T; Bradley DG; Williams RB J Healthc Inf Manag; 2007; 21(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 17583164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Connecting funds with quality outcomes in health care: a blueprint for a Clinical Practice Improvement Payment. Ward M; Daniels SA; Walker GJ; Duckett S Aust Health Rev; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 1():S54-8. PubMed ID: 17402906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Regional collaboration as a model for fostering accountability and transforming health care. Speir AM; Rich JB; Crosby I; Fonner E Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009; 21(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 19632558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Pay for performance and medical education: strategies for preparing physicians of the future. Augustine S; Litaker D Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 18425023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Evaluating pay-for-performance in medicaid through real-world observation. Christianson JB Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(4):w528-31. PubMed ID: 17595199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Improve or lose. Maryland pegs reimbursement to reducing complications for 52 conditions. DerGurahian J Mod Healthc; 2009 Jun; 39(25):14. PubMed ID: 19579672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Quality of care in rheumatic diseases: performance measures and improvement. Harrington JT Curr Opin Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 18349744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Efficiency counts. IHA adds measures to pay-for-performance formula. Romano M Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17354316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. How do we compare? Applying UK pay for performance indicators to an Australian general practice. Elliot-Smith A; Morgan MA Aust Fam Physician; 2010; 39(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 20369134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]